Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #81558 > unrolled thread

Bug#1060706: linux-image-6.1.0-17-amd64: intel i225 NIC loses PCIe link, network becomes unusable

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Bug#1060706: linux-image-6.1.0-17-amd64: intel i225 NIC loses PCIe link, network becomes unusable Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2024-01-13 17:20 +0100
    Bug#1060706: linux-image-6.1.0-17-amd64: intel i225 NIC loses PCIe link, network becomes unusable Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2024-01-13 23:50 +0100

#81558 — Bug#1060706: linux-image-6.1.0-17-amd64: intel i225 NIC loses PCIe link, network becomes unusable

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Saturday, 13 January 2024 16:39:51 CET Arno Lehmann wrote:
> > Just to be clear, can you confirm this is or is not a regression from
> > a previous running 6.1.y kernel?
> 
> On this hardware, the network issues appeared right from the start.
> ...
> Actually I don't even know which was the first kernel version I had on
> this host, but it's been on Bookworm for all its lifetime.

Via https://snapshot.debian.org/package/linux-signed-amd64/ you have easy 
access to previous (6.1) kernels uploaded to Debian with which you can check 
if the problem was present in early 6.1 kernels.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#81566

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Saturday, 13 January 2024 20:22:39 CET Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Am 13.01.2024 um 17:13 schrieb Diederik de Haas:
> > Via https://snapshot.debian.org/package/linux-signed-amd64/ you have easy
> > access to previous (6.1) kernels uploaded to Debian with which you can
> > check if the problem was present in early 6.1 kernels.
> 
> The oldest record of this issue has happened with Linux version
> 6.1.0-11-amd64
> 
> As I usually keep this box updated, and the problems happens only
> randomly, I think the best way forward might be to try with a kernel
> that did *not* show this problem.
> 
> Does that look reasonable?

Yes

> So I conclude I should look at something earlier than what was used with
> boot 86e1a04baba04a409c34796c0fb079ff, i.e.
> 
> journalctl --boot 86e1a04baba04a409c34796c0fb079ff  | head -n 1
> Aug 30 18:16:18 Zwerg kernel: Linux version 6.1.0-11-amd64
> (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU
> ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian
> 6.1.38-4 (2023-08-08)
> 
> correct?
> 
> Via the page you reference, I find a kernel package
> linux-image-6.1.0-1-amd64 6.1.4-1 which might be worth a try.
> 
> I'll need some time to sort out how to install such a package...

https://snapshot.debian.org/package/linux-signed-amd64/6.1.4%2B1/#linux-image-6.1.0-1-amd64_6.1.4-1

It should be as simple as downloading that .deb file and installing it via
``dpkg -i <deb-file>`` or
``apt install ./<deb-file>``

If you also have custom kernel modules via dkms, then you'd also need the
corresponding linux-headers package.
https://snapshot.debian.org/package/linux/6.1.4-1/#linux-headers-6.1.0-1-amd64_6.1.4-1

You could also try version 6.1~rc3+1~exp1, but if it's present in 6.1.4-1,
then I guess it's safe to say the issue is present in the whole 6.1 series
and it probably has never worked (as Salvatore thought).

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel

csiph-web