Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #81071 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-12-06 06:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2023-12-06 06:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Processed: retitle 974921 to Could you consider CONFIG_VDPA=m "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2023-12-06 06:50 +0100
| From | "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-12-06 06:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Processed: retitle 974921 to Could you consider CONFIG_VDPA=m |
| Message-ID | <HHSXf-bBFl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 974921 Could you consider CONFIG_VDPA=m Bug #974921 [src:linux] linux-image-5.9.0-2-arm64: Could you consider CONFIG_VDPA=m and CONFIG_VFIO_MDEV=m ? Changed Bug title to 'Could you consider CONFIG_VDPA=m' from 'linux-image-5.9.0-2-arm64: Could you consider CONFIG_VDPA=m and CONFIG_VFIO_MDEV=m ?'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 974921: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974921 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web