Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #80076 > unrolled thread

Bug#1049450: New rpc.mountd rejects -N 2 option

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

Contents

  Bug#1049450: New rpc.mountd rejects -N 2 option Elliott Mitchell <ehem+debian@m5p.com> - 2023-08-16 01:40 +0200
    Bug#1049450: marked as done (New rpc.mountd rejects -N 2 option) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2023-08-16 09:10 +0200
    Bug#1049450: New rpc.mountd rejects -N 2 option Elliott Mitchell <ehem+debianf@m5p.com> - 2023-08-16 20:40 +0200

#80076 — Bug#1049450: New rpc.mountd rejects -N 2 option

Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:2.6.2-4

Hopefully SSIA.

`rpc.mountd` has a -N option to disable versions of NFS.

I had been previously using "-N 2", but that is now broken.  The error
message was quite non-helpful ("nfsd2" if I recall correctly).  Upon
removing "-N 2", luckily NFSv2 didn't get enabled, but this was still
annoying to deal with.  At worst using a deprecated setting should merely
generate a warning.


-- 
(\___(\___(\______          --=> 8-) EHM <=--          ______/)___/)___/)
 \BS (    |         ehem+sigmsg@m5p.com  PGP 87145445         |    )   /
  \_CS\   |  _____  -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O-   _____  |   /  _/
8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#80081 — Bug#1049450: marked as done (New rpc.mountd rejects -N 2 option)

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Wed, 16 Aug 2023 08:57:16 +0200
with message-id <ZNxzTJv6eUP7yLYs@eldamar.lan>
and subject line Re: Bug#1049450: New rpc.mountd rejects -N 2 option
has caused the Debian Bug report #1049450,
regarding New rpc.mountd rejects -N 2 option
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1049450: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1049450
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#80089

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 08:57:16AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 04:13:59PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > Package: nfs-kernel-server
> > Version: 1:2.6.2-4
> > 
> > Hopefully SSIA.
> > 
> > `rpc.mountd` has a -N option to disable versions of NFS.
> > 
> > I had been previously using "-N 2", but that is now broken.  The error
> > message was quite non-helpful ("nfsd2" if I recall correctly).  Upon
> > removing "-N 2", luckily NFSv2 didn't get enabled, but this was still
> > annoying to deal with.  At worst using a deprecated setting should merely
> > generate a warning.
> 
> Removal of NFSv2 support was documented with a Debian NEWS entry for
> 1:2.6.1-1~exp1, cf. #1006650.
> 
> nfs-utils (1:2.6.1-1~exp1) unstable; urgency=medium
> 
>   Support for NFSv2 has been removed from nfs-kernel-server.  It was
>   previously disabled by default, but still available.
> 
>  -- Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org>  Sun, 13 Mar 2022 19:05:02 +0100

Removing NFSv2 support shouldn't invalidate "-N 2".  "-N 2" is supposed
to disable NFSv2 at runtime, as such removing all NFSv2 support should
merely render "-N 2" 100% redundant and at worst produce a warning.


-- 
(\___(\___(\______          --=> 8-) EHM <=--          ______/)___/)___/)
 \BS (    |         ehem+sigmsg@m5p.com  PGP 87145445         |    )   /
  \_CS\   |  _____  -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O-   _____  |   /  _/
8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel

csiph-web