Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #78764 > unrolled thread

Bug#1034506: Request to enable CONFIG_HSR as module

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

Contents

  Bug#1034506: Request to enable CONFIG_HSR as module Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@smile.fr> - 2023-04-17 12:20 +0200
    Bug#1034506: Request to enable CONFIG_HSR as module Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2023-04-19 09:00 +0200
      Bug#1034506: Request to enable CONFIG_HSR as module Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@smile.fr> - 2023-04-19 09:50 +0200
        Bug#1034506: Request to enable CONFIG_HSR as module Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2023-04-19 12:00 +0200
    Bug#1034506: Request to enable CONFIG_HSR as module Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@smile.fr> - 2023-04-19 12:00 +0200
    Bug#1034506: marked as done (Request to enable CONFIG_HSR as module) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2023-05-15 12:50 +0200

#78764 — Bug#1034506: Request to enable CONFIG_HSR as module

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Source: linux
Severity: wishlist
Tags: newcomer patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: yoann.congal@smile.fr

Hi maintainers,

HSR (High-availability Seamless Redundancy) and PRP (Parallel Redundancy
Protocol) are two network protocols used in environment where network
node failure should not trigger a frame loss. Both provide seamless
failover against this kind of failure.

Both of these are enabled in kernel by CONFIG_HSR which is currently
disabled.

HSR and PRP are defined in IEC 62439-3:2016 and used in many industrial
standards (in our case, IEC 61850 about connected systems in electrical
substations)

This module is handled by iproute2 since 5.10 (available in bullseye).

I've already created a merge-request for this request : 
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/682

Thank you for considering this request.

Best regards,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.6
  APT prefers stable-security
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-0.deb11.5-rt-amd64 (SMP w/24 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#78773

Hi Yoann,

On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 12:12:50PM +0200, Yoann Congal wrote:
> Source: linux
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: newcomer patch
> X-Debbugs-Cc: yoann.congal@smile.fr
> 
> Hi maintainers,
> 
> HSR (High-availability Seamless Redundancy) and PRP (Parallel Redundancy
> Protocol) are two network protocols used in environment where network
> node failure should not trigger a frame loss. Both provide seamless
> failover against this kind of failure.
> 
> Both of these are enabled in kernel by CONFIG_HSR which is currently
> disabled.
> 
> HSR and PRP are defined in IEC 62439-3:2016 and used in many industrial
> standards (in our case, IEC 61850 about connected systems in electrical
> substations)
> 
> This module is handled by iproute2 since 5.10 (available in bullseye).
> 
> I've already created a merge-request for this request : 
> https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/682
> 
> Thank you for considering this request.

Thanks for providing the merge request. Just for cross-reference and
transparency: This change cannot go anymore for bookworm, but we can
pick it up for trixie.

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#78774

On 4/19/23 08:47, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Yoann,

Hi! 

> 
> Thanks for providing the merge request. Just for cross-reference and
> transparency: This change cannot go anymore for bookworm, but we can
> pick it up for trixie.

Yeah, I understood that it won't go into bookworm as I was a bit late for that, but that's OK.
AFAIK it will end up in backports so we could have bookworm + backported kernel with this module activated, or am I wrong?

Thanks!

-- 
Yoann Congal
Smile ECS - Tech Expert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#78776

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 09:39:14AM +0200, Yoann Congal wrote:
> On 4/19/23 08:47, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi Yoann,
> 
> Hi! 
> 
> > 
> > Thanks for providing the merge request. Just for cross-reference and
> > transparency: This change cannot go anymore for bookworm, but we can
> > pick it up for trixie.
> 
> Yeah, I understood that it won't go into bookworm as I was a bit
> late for that, but that's OK.
> AFAIK it will end up in backports so we could have bookworm +
> backported kernel with this module activated, or am I wrong?

No that is correct assumption. Once bookworm-backports opens (and
someone in the team picks it), the version from the upper suite can go
into bookworm-backports, and that will have the same configuration
basis, so include the activated module as well.

So in short, correct.

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#78775

On 4/19/23 11:46, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 09:39:14AM +0200, Yoann Congal wrote:
>> On 4/19/23 08:47, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>>> Hi Yoann,
>>
>> Hi! 
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for providing the merge request. Just for cross-reference and
>>> transparency: This change cannot go anymore for bookworm, but we can
>>> pick it up for trixie.
>>
>> Yeah, I understood that it won't go into bookworm as I was a bit
>> late for that, but that's OK.
>> AFAIK it will end up in backports so we could have bookworm +
>> backported kernel with this module activated, or am I wrong?
> 
> No that is correct assumption. Once bookworm-backports opens (and
> someone in the team picks it), the version from the upper suite can go
> into bookworm-backports, and that will have the same configuration
> basis, so include the activated module as well.
> 
> So in short, correct.

Awesome! Thanks!

-- 
Yoann Congal
Smile ECS - Tech Expert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#79071 — Bug#1034506: marked as done (Request to enable CONFIG_HSR as module)

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2023 10:40:13 +0000
with message-id <E1pyVcj-007Ld0-3E@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1034506: fixed in linux 6.3.2-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034506,
regarding Request to enable CONFIG_HSR as module
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1034506: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034506
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel

csiph-web