Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #78323 > unrolled thread

Bug#1022126: merge this change to stable 5.10 kernel

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Bug#1022126: merge this change to stable 5.10 kernel Taavi Ansper <taavi.ansper@cyber.ee> - 2023-02-20 10:10 +0100
    Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug vmxevilstar@gmail.com - 2023-02-20 10:40 +0100
      Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug Marc-Robin Wendt <wendt@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2023-03-04 09:50 +0100
        Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2023-03-04 10:20 +0100
          Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug Marc-Robin Wendt <wendt@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2023-03-04 12:30 +0100
            Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2023-03-08 17:50 +0100
              Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug Marc-Robin Wendt <wendt@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2023-03-09 21:40 +0100
                Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2023-03-10 17:20 +0100
                  Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug Marc-Robin Wendt <wendt@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2023-03-14 15:00 +0100
                    Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2023-03-17 00:30 +0100
    Bug#1022126: merge this change to stable 5.10 kernel Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2023-02-22 17:40 +0100

#78323 — Bug#1022126: merge this change to stable 5.10 kernel

Hi

Kernel 6.2 is released now with the fix as I understand.

Could this now be merged to 5.10?

Have been waiting for this for 4.5 months now.

Thanks
-- 
Taavi Ansper
taavi.ansper@cyber.ee

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#78324 — Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hello dear mantainers,

I have stopped sending kernel packages as per your request (you defined
it spamming).
For who might be interested I am making the 6.2.0 kernel amd64 packages
myself (the 6.2.0 kernel announcement is not yet
on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux).
Since this version fixes bug 1022126  (and, I am sure others),
Since all the CVE announcements on the site I read are about past
kernels......
If you would like I can send the packages to debian mentor or wherever
is most convenient for you, for testing and review.
Sorry for my past mistakes (still have to fully comprehend where was I
failing, since I was following the manuals, including the source
....etc, I'd like you to be more clear for what concerns where just
following your procedures was failing).


Thanks
Renato Gallo

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#78392 — Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug

Ok folks. That's it now. I have a server farm with Debian+Xen and I'm
stuck in a dead end, because this Bug gets not fixed. I delayed kernel
updates since 5 month now, but can't delay anymore, because of CVE-
2022-42328, CVE-2022-42329 and CVE-2022-3643.

So I have to change to Redhat now? Means my servers will be lost for
Debian for a pretty while. It's a pity, because like this, Debian
Project goes down the drain. Maybe the maintainers should think about
priorities. Bugs like this usually don't affect end consumer devices,
but the big server farm provider, who btw. donate a pretty much of
ressources to the Debian Project.

Greetings
Marc-Robin Wendt


On Mon, 2023-02-20 at 10:30 +0100, vmxevilstar@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello dear mantainers,
> 
> I have stopped sending kernel packages as per your request (you
> defined it spamming).
> For who might be interested I am making the 6.2.0 kernel amd64
> packages myself (the 6.2.0 kernel announcement is not yet
> on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux).
> Since this version fixes bug 1022126  (and, I am sure others),
> Since all the CVE announcements on the site I read are about past
> kernels......
> If you would like I can send the packages to debian mentor or
> wherever is most convenient for you, for testing and review.
> Sorry for my past mistakes (still have to fully comprehend where was
> I failing, since I was following the manuals, including the source
> ....etc, I'd like you to be more clear for what concerns where just
> following your procedures was failing).
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Renato Gallo

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#78393 — Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug

Hi Marc-Robin,

On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 09:36:35AM +0100, Marc-Robin Wendt wrote:
> Ok folks. That's it now. I have a server farm with Debian+Xen and I'm
> stuck in a dead end, because this Bug gets not fixed. I delayed kernel
> updates since 5 month now, but can't delay anymore, because of CVE-
> 2022-42328, CVE-2022-42329 and CVE-2022-3643.
> 
> So I have to change to Redhat now? Means my servers will be lost for
> Debian for a pretty while. It's a pity, because like this, Debian
> Project goes down the drain. Maybe the maintainers should think about
> priorities. Bugs like this usually don't affect end consumer devices,
> but the big server farm provider, who btw. donate a pretty much of
> ressources to the Debian Project.

People involved appear to prefer to rant on this bug instead of
providing help and taking note of what was mentioned in
https://bugs.debian.org/1022126#117 and earlier replies and the fact
that the discussion was brought up to upstream by the Debian
maintainers an happens on the upstream regression list:

https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/754b030c-ba14-167c-e2d0-2f4f5bf55e99@leemhuis.info/

I take your mail such that you are willing to test accordingly patches
which would be followed by the above thread? Including adding
Tested-by on needed-to-backport patches?

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#78394 — Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug

Its actually not my game, but if it speeds things up, I will help
testing (if anyone tells me, what to do).

On Sat, 2023-03-04 at 10:11 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Marc-Robin,
> 
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 09:36:35AM +0100, Marc-Robin Wendt wrote:
> > Ok folks. That's it now. I have a server farm with Debian+Xen and
> > I'm
> > stuck in a dead end, because this Bug gets not fixed. I delayed
> > kernel
> > updates since 5 month now, but can't delay anymore, because of CVE-
> > 2022-42328, CVE-2022-42329 and CVE-2022-3643.
> > 
> > So I have to change to Redhat now? Means my servers will be lost
> > for
> > Debian for a pretty while. It's a pity, because like this, Debian
> > Project goes down the drain. Maybe the maintainers should think
> > about
> > priorities. Bugs like this usually don't affect end consumer
> > devices,
> > but the big server farm provider, who btw. donate a pretty much of
> > ressources to the Debian Project.
> 
> People involved appear to prefer to rant on this bug instead of
> providing help and taking note of what was mentioned in
> https://bugs.debian.org/1022126#117 and earlier replies and the fact
> that the discussion was brought up to upstream by the Debian
> maintainers an happens on the upstream regression list:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/754b030c-ba14-167c-e2d0-2f4f5bf55e99@leemhuis.info/
> 
> I take your mail such that you are willing to test accordingly
> patches
> which would be followed by the above thread? Including adding
> Tested-by on needed-to-backport patches?
> 
> Regards,
> Salvatore
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#78437 — Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi Marc,

On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 12:09:15PM +0100, Marc-Robin Wendt wrote:
> Its actually not my game, but if it speeds things up, I will help
> testing (if anyone tells me, what to do).

Thank you. Can you try with the following series of 4 patches.

https://kernel-team.pages.debian.net/kernel-handbook/ch-common-tasks.html#s4.2.2

will describe how to pass a series of patches to apply for testing.

Thanks already in advance,

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#78456 — Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug

Hello Salvatore,

I followed instructions and it made me a linux-image-5.10.0-21-amd64-
unsigned_5.10.162-1a~test_amd64.deb, which, after installed, boots
nicely and seems to work without errors at mpt3sas anymore.
All XEN-functionality seems to work in our environment.

Anyhow I had some errors:

qla2xxx 0000:61:00.1: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 65536 bytes), total
32768 (slots), used 28799 (slots)

But I'm not sure, if this is releated and it doesn't affect functions.

Do you need further informations about the testing process?
-- 
Greetings
Marc-Robin

On Wed, 2023-03-08 at 17:38 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 12:09:15PM +0100, Marc-Robin Wendt wrote:
> > Its actually not my game, but if it speeds things up, I will help
> > testing (if anyone tells me, what to do).
> 
> Thank you. Can you try with the following series of 4 patches.
> 
> https://kernel-team.pages.debian.net/kernel-handbook/ch-common-tasks.html#s4.2.2
> 
> will describe how to pass a series of patches to apply for testing.
> 
> Thanks already in advance,
> 
> Regards,
> Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#78466 — Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug

Hello Marc-Robin,

On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 09:33:19PM +0100, Marc-Robin Wendt wrote:
> Hello Salvatore,
> 
> I followed instructions and it made me a linux-image-5.10.0-21-amd64-
> unsigned_5.10.162-1a~test_amd64.deb, which, after installed, boots
> nicely and seems to work without errors at mpt3sas anymore.
> All XEN-functionality seems to work in our environment.

Thanks a lot, that was helpful. Good news, Greg has now picked the
series:

https://lore.kernel.org/stable/ZAsoVKmT7N9FD7ik@kroah.com/

> Anyhow I had some errors:
> 
> qla2xxx 0000:61:00.1: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 65536 bytes), total
> 32768 (slots), used 28799 (slots)
> 
> But I'm not sure, if this is releated and it doesn't affect functions.
> 
> Do you need further informations about the testing process?

I assume this has to be tackled separately. You can confim it was not
seen before in earlier kernels?

Thanks,

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#78504 — Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug

Hello Salvatore,

sorry for the delay. So lets hope, this will solve the problem for all
the affected people.

On Fri, 2023-03-10 at 17:11 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hello Marc-Robin,
> 
> 
> > Anyhow I had some errors:
> > 
> > qla2xxx 0000:61:00.1: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 65536 bytes),
> > total
> > 32768 (slots), used 28799 (slots)
> > 
> > But I'm not sure, if this is releated and it doesn't affect
> > functions.
> > 
> > Do you need further informations about the testing process?
> 
> I assume this has to be tackled separately. You can confim it was not
> seen before in earlier kernels?
> 
> 
I checked with last working Kernel 5.10.136-1 and same errors there. So
not related to our problem. Seems like is related to LVM.

Thanks for you efforts.

Greets 
Marc-Robin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#78520 — Bug#1022126: New mainline kernel is out fixes for example 1022126 bug

Hi Marc-Robin,

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 02:48:56PM +0100, Marc-Robin Wendt wrote:
> Hello Salvatore,
> 
> sorry for the delay. So lets hope, this will solve the problem for all
> the affected people.
> 
> On Fri, 2023-03-10 at 17:11 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hello Marc-Robin,
> > 
> > 
> > > Anyhow I had some errors:
> > > 
> > > qla2xxx 0000:61:00.1: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 65536 bytes),
> > > total
> > > 32768 (slots), used 28799 (slots)
> > > 
> > > But I'm not sure, if this is releated and it doesn't affect
> > > functions.
> > > 
> > > Do you need further informations about the testing process?
> > 
> > I assume this has to be tackled separately. You can confim it was not
> > seen before in earlier kernels?
> > 
> > 
> I checked with last working Kernel 5.10.136-1 and same errors there. So
> not related to our problem. Seems like is related to LVM.
> 
> Thanks for you efforts.

Thanks for checking back to the earlier version, so at least not
related to this issue and relieved the patch series resolves the
problem. I'm confident will be as well the case for the other
affected.

I have queued them for the next Debian upload based on at least
5.10.174-1 as well.

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#78338

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 10:59:50AM +0200, Taavi Ansper wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Kernel 6.2 is released now with the fix as I understand.
> 
> Could this now be merged to 5.10?
> 
> Have been waiting for this for 4.5 months now.

See the reply from https://bugs.debian.org/1022126#102 (i.e. someone
needs to ask stable maintainers upstream to backport the change as
well to the relevant stable series). Notabene, the patch cannot be
cleanly cherry-picked.

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel

csiph-web