Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #79667 > unrolled thread

Bug#1041678: at24 0-005…: supply vcc not found, using dummy regulator

Started byAlMa <AlMa0@ro.ru>
First post2023-07-22 03:10 +0200
Last post2023-08-01 01:20 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel


Contents

  Bug#1041678: at24 0-005…: supply vcc not found, using dummy regulator AlMa <AlMa0@ro.ru> - 2023-07-22 03:10 +0200
    Bug#1041678: marked as done (at24 0-005…:  supply vcc not found, using dummy regulator) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2023-08-01 01:20 +0200

#79667 — Bug#1041678: at24 0-005…: supply vcc not found, using dummy regulator

FromAlMa <AlMa0@ro.ru>
Date2023-07-22 03:10 +0200
SubjectBug#1041678: at24 0-005…: supply vcc not found, using dummy regulator
Message-ID<GU9i9-1R3x-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Package: linux-image-6.1.0-10-amd64
Version: 6.1.37-1
Severity: wishlist
Control: affects -1 src:linux

In my journal I discovered a bunch of orange warnings of the form “at24 
0-005…: supply vcc not found, using dummy regulator”:

Jul 22 00:07:06 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: cdc_acm: USB Abstract 
Control Model driver for USB modems and ISDN adapters
Jul 22 00:07:06 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: input: PC Speaker as 
/devices/platform/pcspkr/input/input9
Jul 22 00:07:06 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: usbcore: registered new 
interface driver cdc_mbim
Jul 22 00:07:06 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: at24 0-0050: supply vcc 
not found, using dummy regulator
Jul 22 00:07:06 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: at24 0-0050: 256 byte spd 
EEPROM, read-only
Jul 22 00:07:06 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: at24 0-0051: supply vcc 
not found, using dummy regulator
Jul 22 00:07:06 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: at24 0-0051: 256 byte spd 
EEPROM, read-only
Jul 22 00:07:06 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: at24 0-0052: supply vcc 
not found, using dummy regulator
Jul 22 00:07:06 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: iTCO_vendor_support: 
vendor-support=0
Jul 22 00:07:06 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: at24 0-0052: 256 byte spd 
EEPROM, read-only
Jul 22 00:07:06 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: at24 0-0053: supply vcc 
not found, using dummy regulator
Jul 22 00:07:06 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: at24 0-0053: 256 byte spd 
EEPROM, read-only
Jul 22 00:07:06 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: mc: Linux media interface: 
v0.10

First, I asked myself what I am being warned about, and it took me quite 
some time to find out what “vcc” means.  Is actually “Vcc”, the voltage 
common collector as on 
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4b/Voltage_subscripts.png 
, meant (where “cc” or “CC” is sometimes typeset as a subscript)?  If 
so, write this way, i.e., “Vcc” (or, as a proper abbreviation, “VCC”). 
The term “vcc” in small letters means to me, for example, the 
command-line call of the verifying C compiler; to other folks “vcc” 
might mean something else.  If “vcc” here is NOT the voltage common 
collector, consider writing the full term instead of the abbreviation. 
(Similar goes for “spd”: if it's a proper abbreviation and not a typo, 
consider capitalizing all the letters. Further, even “SPD“ might mean 
many things, from “Serial Presence Detect” to “Surge Protection Device”, 
so if the context doesn't make it clear, write the full term instead of 
the abbreviation.)

Second, are these orange messages real warnings (i.e., they foretell 
potential havoc) or only informational?  In the real case, what could go 
wrong?  In the purely informational case, consider making them normal 
gray-white messages, so that the user is nor really feeling warned or 
bothered.

Gratefully,
AlMa

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#79857 — Bug#1041678: marked as done (at24 0-005…: supply vcc not found, using dummy regulator)

From"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date2023-08-01 01:20 +0200
SubjectBug#1041678: marked as done (at24 0-005…: supply vcc not found, using dummy regulator)
Message-ID<GXKlb-49LV-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#79667

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Tue, 01 Aug 2023 01:09:37 +0200
with message-id <6531216.tM3a2QDmDi@bagend>
and subject line Re: Debian's BTS is not for regular user questions
has caused the Debian Bug report #1041678,
regarding at24 0-005…: supply vcc not found, using dummy regulator
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1041678: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1041678
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web