Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #78152 > unrolled thread

Bug#1030094: linux-headers-amd64: DKMS fails to build - missing evdi-dkms

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

Contents

  Bug#1030094: linux-headers-amd64: DKMS fails to build - missing evdi-dkms DAB <macdabby@gmail.com> - 2023-01-31 03:50 +0100
    Processed: Re: Bug#1030094: linux-headers-amd64: DKMS fails to  build - missing evdi-dkms "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2023-01-31 08:20 +0100
    Bug#1030094: linux-headers-amd64: DKMS fails to build - missing evdi-dkms Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2023-01-31 08:20 +0100

#78152 — Bug#1030094: linux-headers-amd64: DKMS fails to build - missing evdi-dkms

Package: linux-headers-amd64
Version: 6.1.7-1
Severity: normal
Tags: newcomer
X-Debbugs-Cc: macdabby@gmail.com

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
apt upgrade attempted to install linux-headers v 6.1.4 through 6.1.7 failed to
configure. the error came from DKMS build

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
examining the logs i saw it was something with evdi. i searched and found a
package evdi-dkms which seemed appropriate. i installed that and it fixed the
problem.

   * What was the outcome of this action?
the build failed and prevented boot without reverting to a previous version of
the kernel

   * What outcome did you expect instead?
if the package is needed, it should be flagged as a dependency

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (100, 'bullseye-fasttrack'), (100, 'bullseye-backports-staging')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.0.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages linux-headers-amd64 depends on:
ii  linux-headers-6.1.0-2-amd64  6.1.7-1

linux-headers-amd64 recommends no packages.

linux-headers-amd64 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#78153 — Processed: Re: Bug#1030094: linux-headers-amd64: DKMS fails to build - missing evdi-dkms

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 src:dkms
Bug #1030094 [linux-headers-amd64] linux-headers-amd64: DKMS fails to build - missing evdi-dkms
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-headers-amd64' to 'src:dkms'.
No longer marked as found in versions linux-signed-amd64/6.1.7+1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1030094 to the same values previously set

-- 
1030094: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030094
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#78154

Control: reassign -1 src:dkms

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 09:42:03PM -0500, DAB wrote:
> Package: linux-headers-amd64
> Version: 6.1.7-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: newcomer
> X-Debbugs-Cc: macdabby@gmail.com
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
> 
>    * What led up to the situation?
> apt upgrade attempted to install linux-headers v 6.1.4 through 6.1.7 failed to
> configure. the error came from DKMS build
> 
>    * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
>      ineffective)?
> examining the logs i saw it was something with evdi. i searched and found a
> package evdi-dkms which seemed appropriate. i installed that and it fixed the
> problem.
> 
>    * What was the outcome of this action?
> the build failed and prevented boot without reverting to a previous version of
> the kernel
> 
>    * What outcome did you expect instead?
> if the package is needed, it should be flagged as a dependency
> 
> *** End of the template - remove these template lines ***

Can you provide the install logs (have a look at
/var/log/apt/term.log* for the given installation/upgrade).

I suspect this is the same as https://bugs.debian.org/1029063
(but for now not merging, until not confirmed).

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel

csiph-web