Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #78089 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Computer Enthusiastic <computer.enthusiastic@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-01-27 21:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2023-02-05 18:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
Request to cherry picking a patch to fix bug #989705 for kernels 5.10.y Computer Enthusiastic <computer.enthusiastic@gmail.com> - 2023-01-27 21:10 +0100
Re: Request to cherry picking a patch to fix bug #989705 for kernels 5.10.y Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2023-01-27 22:40 +0100
Re: Request to cherry picking a patch to fix bug #989705 for kernels 5.10.y Computer Enthusiastic <computer.enthusiastic@gmail.com> - 2023-01-28 16:10 +0100
Re: Request to cherry picking a patch to fix bug #989705 for kernels 5.10.y Computer Enthusiastic <computer.enthusiastic@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 18:20 +0100
| From | Computer Enthusiastic <computer.enthusiastic@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-27 21:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Request to cherry picking a patch to fix bug #989705 for kernels 5.10.y |
| Message-ID | <FSDcR-1A08-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello, The bug #989705 [1] is currently closed. It was solved for kernels version 5.15+ using the patch [2] from upstream. This patch [2] applies to kernel version 5.10.y, too. I used it with a custom built kernel since it was published . The author of the patch acknowledged that the patch applies to kernel version 5.10.y asking me to send it out to the stable mailing list. I did it, but I did not receive an answer. I tried to peek upstream, but again no answer. Therefore, I'm sending this post to ask the debian-kernel mailing list if it is possibile to cherry pick the patch [1] to make it land in the next release of Debian Kernel 5.10.y. Let me know if I can help in any way. I cannot update bug #989705 because it is currently closed. Thanks in advance for your attention. --- [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989705 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?h=v6.0-rc5&id=6b04ce966a738ecdd9294c9593e48513c0dc90aa
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-27 22:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Request to cherry picking a patch to fix bug #989705 for kernels 5.10.y |
| Message-ID | <FSEBX-1AIM-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #78089 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Friday, 27 January 2023 21:05:47 CET Computer Enthusiastic wrote: > This patch [2] applies to kernel version 5.10.y, too. I used it with a > custom built kernel since it was published . > > The author of the patch acknowledged that the patch applies to kernel > version 5.10.y asking me to send it out to the stable mailing list. I > did it, but I did not receive an answer. I tried to peek upstream, but > again no answer. I noticed in [2] this: "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.15+" The post on marc.info (try to use lore.kernel.org links as that works easier for most people) seems to be posted to the 'linux-kernel' list, which I *think* is not the same as 'stable@vger.kernel.org'. So I would suggest to try again by sending it to stable.vger.k.o with explicit mention of kernel 5.10. GKH is a busy man so I recommend to take your time to construct an email which is as short as possible, but still contains all the info needed to evaluate the request. I would recommend to mention the following things: Commit ID in 5.15 = 3640cdccbe75b8922e5bfc0191dd37e3aaa24833 Link to post in which the patch author said they'd ACK it for 5.10: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CACO55tv0jO2TmuWcwFiAUQB-__DZVwhv7WNN9MfgMXV053gknw@mail.gmail.com/ In your mail make sure the link doesn't break over 2 lines like it does above. HTH, Diederik > --- > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989705 > [2] > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?h > =v6.0-rc5&id=6b04ce966a738ecdd9294c9593e48513c0dc90aa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Computer Enthusiastic <computer.enthusiastic@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-28 16:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FSV05-1LbM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #78091 |
Hello, On 27/01/2023 22:35, Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Friday, 27 January 2023 21:05:47 CET Computer Enthusiastic wrote: >> This patch [2] applies to kernel version 5.10.y, too. I used it with a >> custom built kernel since it was published . >> >> The author of the patch acknowledged that the patch applies to kernel >> version 5.10.y asking me to send it out to the stable mailing list. I >> did it, but I did not receive an answer. I tried to peek upstream, but >> again no answer. > > I would recommend to mention the following things: > > Commit ID in 5.15 = 3640cdccbe75b8922e5bfc0191dd37e3aaa24833 > > Link to post in which the patch author said they'd ACK it for 5.10: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CACO55tv0jO2TmuWcwFiAUQB-__DZVwhv7WNN9MfgMXV053gknw@mail.gmail.com/ > > In your mail make sure the link doesn't break over 2 lines like it does above. > > HTH, > Diederik Thanks for your suggestions. This [1] is the reference to my new request. I hope I dit it right. --- [1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20220819200928.401416-1-kherbst@redhat.com/T/#ebac71b81ccec2fb3d1c467e73f4f46667ef75296
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Computer Enthusiastic <computer.enthusiastic@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-05 18:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FVQQh-3Fj4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #78091 |
Hello Diederik, On 27/01/2023 22:35, Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Friday, 27 January 2023 21:05:47 CET Computer Enthusiastic wrote: >> This patch [2] applies to kernel version 5.10.y, too. I used it with a >> custom built kernel since it was published . >> >> The author of the patch acknowledged that the patch applies to kernel >> version 5.10.y asking me to send it out to the stable mailing list. I >> did it, but I did not receive an answer. I tried to peek upstream, but >> again no answer. > > I noticed in [2] this: "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.15+" > > The post on marc.info (try to use lore.kernel.org links as that works easier > for most people) seems to be posted to the 'linux-kernel' list, which I > *think* is not the same as 'stable@vger.kernel.org'. > > So I would suggest to try again by sending it to stable.vger.k.o with explicit > mention of kernel 5.10. > GKH is a busy man so I recommend to take your time to construct an email which > is as short as possible, but still contains all the info needed to evaluate > the request. > > I would recommend to mention the following things: > > Commit ID in 5.15 = 3640cdccbe75b8922e5bfc0191dd37e3aaa24833 > > Link to post in which the patch author said they'd ACK it for 5.10: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CACO55tv0jO2TmuWcwFiAUQB-__DZVwhv7WNN9MfgMXV053gknw@mail.gmail.com/ > > In your mail make sure the link doesn't break over 2 lines like it does above. > > HTH, > Diederik >> --- >> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989705 >> [2] >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?h >> =v6.0-rc5&id=6b04ce966a738ecdd9294c9593e48513c0dc90aa > Just a feedback. Thanks for your tips. Greg Kroah-Hartman backported the patch into Linux 5.10.166 [1]. Therefore it will hopefully land in the next Debian stable point release when it will be released. I would like to thank Salvatore Bonaccorso who helped me to explain Greg the request for backporting the patch: --- [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=v5.10.166&id=8fe3e574b3ac426ff4a11299f098e1c91538f3e5
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web