Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #74950 > unrolled thread

iproute2 team maintainership

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

Contents

  iproute2 team maintainership Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2022-04-01 23:10 +0200
    Re: iproute2 team maintainership Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2022-04-10 20:40 +0200
      Re: iproute2 team maintainership Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2022-04-10 22:50 +0200
        Re: iproute2 team maintainership Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2022-04-11 00:00 +0200
          Re: iproute2 team maintainership Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2022-04-11 00:10 +0200
            Re: iproute2 team maintainership Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2022-04-11 00:30 +0200

#74950 — iproute2 team maintainership

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hello Kernel Team,

I have been maintaining iproute2 for more than four years now. And to
be clear I am happy to continue, and don't need help with anything in
particular.

But thinking about core packages and team maintainership in general, I
think it would be good to have iproute2 under a team umbrella, given
it's prio: important.

What do you think about moving the Salsa repo to the kernel team area
and the the maintainer field to the kernel mailing list? After all,
it's maintained upstream in the kernel infrastructure too, and it's
very closely related.

(previous maintainers CC'ed as FYI)

Thoughts?

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#75002

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, 2022-04-01 at 22:05 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Hello Kernel Team,
> 
> I have been maintaining iproute2 for more than four years now. And to
> be clear I am happy to continue, and don't need help with anything in
> particular.
> 
> But thinking about core packages and team maintainership in general, I
> think it would be good to have iproute2 under a team umbrella, given
> it's prio: important.
> 
> What do you think about moving the Salsa repo to the kernel team area
> and the the maintainer field to the kernel mailing list? After all,
> it's maintained upstream in the kernel infrastructure too, and it's
> very closely related.
> 
> (previous maintainers CC'ed as FYI)
> 
> Thoughts?

Yes, I think this would be a good fit for the kernel team.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
The program is absolutely right; therefore, the computer must be wrong.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#75003

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 20:31 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-04-01 at 22:05 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Hello Kernel Team,
> > 
> > I have been maintaining iproute2 for more than four years now. And
> > to
> > be clear I am happy to continue, and don't need help with anything
> > in
> > particular.
> > 
> > But thinking about core packages and team maintainership in
> > general, I
> > think it would be good to have iproute2 under a team umbrella,
> > given
> > it's prio: important.
> > 
> > What do you think about moving the Salsa repo to the kernel team
> > area
> > and the the maintainer field to the kernel mailing list? After all,
> > it's maintained upstream in the kernel infrastructure too, and it's
> > very closely related.
> > 
> > (previous maintainers CC'ed as FYI)
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> Yes, I think this would be a good fit for the kernel team.

Thank you!

I've opened a request for the Salsa admins to move the repo:

https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support/-/issues/295

Could you please add me to the kernel-team Salsa group?

As soon as the repository move is sorted, I will do a new upload
switching the Maintainer field to Debian Kernel Team.

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#75004

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 21:48 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 20:31 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-04-01 at 22:05 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > Hello Kernel Team,
> > > 
> > > I have been maintaining iproute2 for more than four years now. And
> > > to
> > > be clear I am happy to continue, and don't need help with anything
> > > in
> > > particular.
> > > 
> > > But thinking about core packages and team maintainership in
> > > general, I
> > > think it would be good to have iproute2 under a team umbrella,
> > > given
> > > it's prio: important.
> > > 
> > > What do you think about moving the Salsa repo to the kernel team
> > > area
> > > and the the maintainer field to the kernel mailing list? After all,
> > > it's maintained upstream in the kernel infrastructure too, and it's
> > > very closely related.
> > > 
> > > (previous maintainers CC'ed as FYI)
> > > 
> > > Thoughts?
> > 
> > Yes, I think this would be a good fit for the kernel team.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> I've opened a request for the Salsa admins to move the repo:
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support/-/issues/295
> 
> Could you please add me to the kernel-team Salsa group?
> 
> As soon as the repository move is sorted, I will do a new upload
> switching the Maintainer field to Debian Kernel Team.

OK, I've invited you to the group.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
The program is absolutely right; therefore, the computer must be wrong.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#75006

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 23:58 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 21:48 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 20:31 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2022-04-01 at 22:05 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > > Hello Kernel Team,
> > > > 
> > > > I have been maintaining iproute2 for more than four years now.
> > > > And
> > > > to
> > > > be clear I am happy to continue, and don't need help with
> > > > anything
> > > > in
> > > > particular.
> > > > 
> > > > But thinking about core packages and team maintainership in
> > > > general, I
> > > > think it would be good to have iproute2 under a team umbrella,
> > > > given
> > > > it's prio: important.
> > > > 
> > > > What do you think about moving the Salsa repo to the kernel
> > > > team
> > > > area
> > > > and the the maintainer field to the kernel mailing list? After
> > > > all,
> > > > it's maintained upstream in the kernel infrastructure too, and
> > > > it's
> > > > very closely related.
> > > > 
> > > > (previous maintainers CC'ed as FYI)
> > > > 
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > 
> > > Yes, I think this would be a good fit for the kernel team.
> > 
> > Thank you!
> > 
> > I've opened a request for the Salsa admins to move the repo:
> > 
> > https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support/-/issues/295
> > 
> > Could you please add me to the kernel-team Salsa group?
> > 
> > As soon as the repository move is sorted, I will do a new upload
> > switching the Maintainer field to Debian Kernel Team.
> 
> OK, I've invited you to the group.
> 
> Ben.

Thank you!

Could you also please add me as a maintainer/admin of the iproute2
repo? I can't push right now:

Writing objects: 100% (4/4), 428 bytes | 428.00 KiB/s, done.
Total 4 (delta 3), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
remote: GitLab: You are not allowed to push code to protected branches on this project.
To salsa.debian.org:kernel-team/iproute2.git
 ! [remote rejected]   debian/sid -> debian/sid (pre-receive hook declined)
error: failed to push some refs to 'salsa.debian.org:kernel-team/iproute2.git'

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#75012

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 23:00 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 23:58 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 21:48 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 20:31 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2022-04-01 at 22:05 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > > > Hello Kernel Team,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I have been maintaining iproute2 for more than four years now.
> > > > > And
> > > > > to
> > > > > be clear I am happy to continue, and don't need help with
> > > > > anything
> > > > > in
> > > > > particular.
> > > > > 
> > > > > But thinking about core packages and team maintainership in
> > > > > general, I
> > > > > think it would be good to have iproute2 under a team umbrella,
> > > > > given
> > > > > it's prio: important.
> > > > > 
> > > > > What do you think about moving the Salsa repo to the kernel
> > > > > team
> > > > > area
> > > > > and the the maintainer field to the kernel mailing list? After
> > > > > all,
> > > > > it's maintained upstream in the kernel infrastructure too, and
> > > > > it's
> > > > > very closely related.
> > > > > 
> > > > > (previous maintainers CC'ed as FYI)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, I think this would be a good fit for the kernel team.
> > > 
> > > Thank you!
> > > 
> > > I've opened a request for the Salsa admins to move the repo:
> > > 
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support/-/issues/295
> > > 
> > > Could you please add me to the kernel-team Salsa group?
> > > 
> > > As soon as the repository move is sorted, I will do a new upload
> > > switching the Maintainer field to Debian Kernel Team.
> > 
> > OK, I've invited you to the group.
> > 
> > Ben.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Could you also please add me as a maintainer/admin of the iproute2
> repo? I can't push right now:
> 
> Writing objects: 100% (4/4), 428 bytes | 428.00 KiB/s, done.
> Total 4 (delta 3), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
> remote: GitLab: You are not allowed to push code to protected branches on this project.
> To salsa.debian.org:kernel-team/iproute2.git
>  ! [remote rejected]   debian/sid -> debian/sid (pre-receive hook declined)
> error: failed to push some refs to 'salsa.debian.org:kernel-team/iproute2.git'

Done.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Knowledge is power.  France is bacon.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel

csiph-web