Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #73546 > unrolled thread

Bug#998078: reportbug: linux-headers-cloud-arm64 from buster-backports can't be satisfied

Started byRich Ercolani <rincebrain@gmail.com>
First post2021-10-29 22:10 +0200
Last post2021-10-30 17:00 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel


Contents

  Bug#998078: reportbug: linux-headers-cloud-arm64 from buster-backports can't be satisfied Rich Ercolani <rincebrain@gmail.com> - 2021-10-29 22:10 +0200
    Bug#998078:  Rich <rincebrain@gmail.com> - 2021-10-30 16:50 +0200
      Bug#998078:  Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-10-30 17:00 +0200

#73546 — Bug#998078: reportbug: linux-headers-cloud-arm64 from buster-backports can't be satisfied

FromRich Ercolani <rincebrain@gmail.com>
Date2021-10-29 22:10 +0200
SubjectBug#998078: reportbug: linux-headers-cloud-arm64 from buster-backports can't be satisfied
Message-ID<DdGml-F0-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Package: linux-headers-cloud-arm64
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

linux-headers-cloud-arm64 and linux-image-cloud-arm64 point to -5.10.0-0.bpo.8-cloud-arm64, except...
while linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.8-cloud-arm64 is still around, linux-headers-... is not.

So you can't install the headers for the cloud-arm64 image without reaching out to snapshot.debian.org.

Presumably because the bpo.9 version hasn't produced a signed image yet, but the old one got expired because the new headers package made it in?

You can see this if you check out:
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=5.10.0-0.bpo.8-cloud-arm64
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=5.10.0-0.bpo.9-cloud-arm64

Thanks,
- Rich

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.11
  APT prefers oldstable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: arm64 (aarch64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-18-arm64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages linux-headers-cloud-arm64 depends on:
pn  linux-headers-5.10.0-0.bpo.8-cloud-arm64  <none>

linux-headers-cloud-arm64 recommends no packages.

linux-headers-cloud-arm64 suggests no packages.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#73557 — Bug#998078:

FromRich <rincebrain@gmail.com>
Date2021-10-30 16:50 +0200
SubjectBug#998078:
Message-ID<DdXQd-3gR-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#73546
I see, so "kernel package in oldstable-backports is unusable" is not a bug.

Is there any way I can view why it's been sitting for so long that
this happened, or any estimate on how much longer it'll be broken?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#73558 — Bug#998078:

FromSalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Date2021-10-30 17:00 +0200
SubjectBug#998078:
Message-ID<DdXZU-3kj-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#73557
Hi,

On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 10:39:19AM -0400, Rich wrote:
> I see, so "kernel package in oldstable-backports is unusable" is not a bug.
> 
> Is there any way I can view why it's been sitting for so long that
> this happened, or any estimate on how much longer it'll be broken?

I did ping yesterday backports FTP masters team. The problem here is:
the packages need in meanwhile be processed multiple times, very
roughtly, first the backports FTP masters need to flag the package to
be accepted, then the packages (unsigned) are built, next the main FTP
masters need to process the packages for signing, but given the nature
of the packages the linux-signed-{amd64,i386,arm64} source packages
needs another manual processing.

This is all not very smooth, and this time I guess it went longer than
usual.

$ rmadison linux-signed-arm64
linux-signed-arm64 | 4.19.118+2+deb10u1~bpo9+1 | stretch-backports  | source
linux-signed-arm64 | 4.19.194+2                | buster-updates     | source
linux-signed-arm64 | 4.19.194+3                | oldstable          | source
linux-signed-arm64 | 4.19.208+1                | oldstable          | source
linux-signed-arm64 | 5.10.46+4~bpo10+1         | buster-backports   | source
linux-signed-arm64 | 5.10.46+5                 | stable             | source
linux-signed-arm64 | 5.10.70+1~bpo10+1         | backports-policy   | source
linux-signed-arm64 | 5.10.70+1                 | stable             | source
linux-signed-arm64 | 5.14.9+2~bpo11+1          | bullseye-backports | source
linux-signed-arm64 | 5.14.9+2                  | testing            | source
linux-signed-arm64 | 5.14.12+1                 | unstable           | source

currently shows that linux-signed-arm64 for 5.10.70+1~bpo10+1 is yet to be
processed from the backports-policy queue.

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web