Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #72626 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-08-15 13:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2021-11-04 10:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
Bug#992184: linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2021-08-15 13:10 +0200
Bug#992184: #992184 linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2021-09-14 08:30 +0200
Bug#992184: #992184 linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2021-09-24 01:40 +0200
Processed: Re: #992184 linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin? "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2021-09-14 08:30 +0200
Processed: Re: #992184 linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin? "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2021-09-24 01:40 +0200
Bug#992184: marked as done (linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin?) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2021-11-04 10:10 +0100
| From | Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-15 13:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#992184: linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin? |
| Message-ID | <CMmbE-Q3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Source: linux Version: 5.13.9-1~exp2 Severity: wishlist Currently there are some LED triggers builtin and some as modules: $ grep 'CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER' /boot/config-5.13.0-trunk-arm64 CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS=y CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_TIMER=m CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_ONESHOT=m CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_DISK=y CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_MTD=y CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT=m CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_BACKLIGHT=m CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_CPU=y CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_ACTIVITY=m CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_GPIO=m CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_DEFAULT_ON=m CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_TRANSIENT=m CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_CAMERA=m CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_PANIC=y CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_NETDEV=m CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_PATTERN=m CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_AUDIO=m # CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_TTY is not set While working on https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/384 I noticed that after enabling the modules, the heartbeat LED on my Rock64 didn't turn 'on', while it is defined as the default trigger in the DeviceTree. I noticed that `/sys/devices/platform/leds/leds/led-1/trigger` didn't even contain 'heartbeat' as trigger. After doing `modprobe ledtrig-heartbeat`, 'heartbeat' was available and automatically selected as the current trigger. Doing 'modprobe' is inconvenient, but that can be worked around by creating a file in `/etc/modprobe.d/`. But I use it in a similar way as 'panic', which is builtin. The Rock64 has a bit of a thermal problem and f.e. compiling a kernel is out of the question without cooling (which I do not yet have). The CPU/device gets so hot, it freezes and the only way out is pulling the plug. So when the 'heartbeat' LED stops blinking, I know it crashed. Like 'panic', but with a slightly different cause. As mentioned earlier, 'heartbeat' was defined as the default trigger in the DeviceTree of the Rock64. It turns out, there are a lot more: diederik@bagend:~/dev/debian/salsa/kernel-team/linux$ grep -r 'linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";' arch/ | wc -l 281 Most are in arch arm*, but also in arc/powerpc/microblaze/mips. Which raises the question (of this bug): Should `CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT=m` be changed to `=y`? Cheers, Diederik PS: kernel is tainted as I'm running 5.13.9-1~exp3 which contain modifications from MR 384, based off of current 'master'. PS2: I sent this bug report earlier (against src:linux-config-5.13), but there was a problem with bugs.d.o, so I assume it went to /dev/null -- System Information: Debian Release: 11.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: arm64 (aarch64) Kernel: Linux 5.13.0-trunk-arm64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-14 08:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#992184: #992184 linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin? |
| Message-ID | <CXa77-qc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #72626 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Control: found -1 5.14.3-1~exp1 Control: tag -1 patch On 15 Aug 2021 13:06:48 +0200 Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> wrote: > Most are in arch arm*, but also in arc/powerpc/microblaze/mips. At https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/390 I submitted a MR which makes this trigger builtin on arm* platforms. Cheers, Diederik
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-24 01:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#992184: #992184 linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin? |
| Message-ID | <D0GtP-XB-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #72918 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Control: tag -1 pending On 14 Sep 2021 02:16:18 +0200 Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> wrote: > At https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/390 > I submitted a MR which makes this trigger builtin on arm* platforms. That MR got merged into the 'master' branch with: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/commit/c74c840c943967163240901e057fe6f9ed280497 So adding the pending tag.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-14 08:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Processed: Re: #992184 linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin? |
| Message-ID | <CXa7a-qc-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #72626 |
Processing control commands: > found -1 5.14.3-1~exp1 Bug #992184 [src:linux] linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin? Marked as found in versions linux/5.14.3-1~exp1. > tag -1 patch Bug #992184 [src:linux] linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin? Added tag(s) patch. -- 992184: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992184 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-24 01:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Processed: Re: #992184 linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin? |
| Message-ID | <D0GtQ-XB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #72626 |
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #992184 [src:linux] linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin? Added tag(s) pending. -- 992184: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992184 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-04 10:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#992184: marked as done (linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin?) |
| Message-ID | <DfGUX-2OC-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #72626 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Your message dated Thu, 04 Nov 2021 09:00:08 +0000 with message-id <E1miYbQ-000Hhx-IG@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#992184: fixed in linux 5.15-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #992184, regarding linux: Should CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT be builtin? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 992184: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992184 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web