Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #71336 > unrolled thread

Bug#789610: symlink(2) refuses to let me create an empty symlink

Started bySalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
First post2021-05-08 21:30 +0200
Last post2021-05-08 21:30 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#789610: symlink(2) refuses to let me create an empty symlink Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-05-08 21:30 +0200

#71336 — Bug#789610: symlink(2) refuses to let me create an empty symlink

FromSalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Date2021-05-08 21:30 +0200
SubjectBug#789610: symlink(2) refuses to let me create an empty symlink
Message-ID<CcAOg-2Nd-57@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi,

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:49:23AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 src:linux 3.2.68-1+deb7u1
> Control: tag -1 upstream
> 
> On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 17:10 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64
> > Version: 3.2.68-1+deb7u1
> > 
> > I may be tilting at windmills here, but I think
> >    ln -s '' foo
> > should work, rather than failing with ENOENT.
> > 
> > The fact that it didn't work inconvenienced me while I was trying to
> > write a test case for some other software.  I would have been happy
> > for the link to be created and then be un-dereferenceable.
> > 
> > I would, in fact, have been happy with either the traditional BSD
> > behaviour (create the link, treat it as a link to "."), or the
> > traditional SysV behaviour (create the link, dereferencing gives
> > ENOENT).
> > 
> > See also:
> > 
> >   https://lwn.net/Articles/551224/
> >   https://lwn.net/Articles/551228/
> > 
> > Do you think you could try to use any good connections you have to get
> > this fixed ?
> 
> Don't hold your breath.

Given this, is if at all to be handled upstream, I think we should
close this report by now. I do not see likely that it will ongoing.

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web