Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #71133 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-05-02 15:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2021-05-03 22:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#959757: This is a regression Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-05-02 15:00 +0200
Bug#959757: This is a regression Peter Leipold <leipold.peter@gmail.com> - 2021-05-02 17:40 +0200
Bug#959757: This is a regression wferi@niif.hu - 2021-05-02 18:10 +0200
Bug#959757: This is a regression Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-05-03 22:00 +0200
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-05-02 15:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#959757: This is a regression |
| Message-ID | <CajRv-M6-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 01:15:38PM +0200, wferi@niif.hu wrote: > Control: found -1 5.5.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 > > I started to see this problem after upgrading from 5.4.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 > to 5.5.0-0.bpo.2-amd64. It goes like: Do you still have the issue reproducible with a recent kernel from unstable or buster-backports? Regards, Salvatore
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Leipold <leipold.peter@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-05-02 17:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Camml-2qx-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #71133 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi, I'm the original reporter. FYI, the problem was fixed with one of the kernel updates on last summer. It's stable since then. Peter On 5/2/21 2:54 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 01:15:38PM +0200, wferi@niif.hu wrote: >> Control: found -1 5.5.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 >> >> I started to see this problem after upgrading from 5.4.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 >> to 5.5.0-0.bpo.2-amd64. It goes like: > Do you still have the issue reproducible with a recent kernel from > unstable or buster-backports? > > Regards, > Salvatore
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | wferi@niif.hu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-05-02 18:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CamPn-2QM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #71164 |
Peter Leipold <leipold.peter@gmail.com> writes: > On 5/2/21 2:54 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 01:15:38PM +0200, wferi@niif.hu wrote: >> >>> I started to see this problem after upgrading from 5.4.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 >>> to 5.5.0-0.bpo.2-amd64. It goes like: >> >> Do you still have the issue reproducible with a recent kernel from >> unstable or buster-backports? > > Hi, I'm the original reporter. FYI, the problem was fixed with one of > the kernel updates on last summer. It's stable since then. Hi, I certainly can't reproduce it with the current 5.10.24-1~bpo10+1. Not even with 5.10.13-1~bpo10+1, and I haven't got older logs anymore. -- Feri
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-05-03 22:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CaMTv-1hV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #71164 |
Hi Peter, On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 05:32:19PM +0200, Peter Leipold wrote: > Hi, I'm the original reporter. FYI, the problem was fixed with one of the > kernel updates on last summer. It's stable since then. Thanks for reporting back! Regards, Salvatore
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web