Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #71202 > unrolled thread

Bug#964734: reopened / test with 5.12.0-11146-g8ca5297e7e3

Started byBernhard Turmann <bernhard@turmann.eu>
First post2021-05-03 19:20 +0200
Last post2021-10-18 17:00 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#964734: reopened / test with 5.12.0-11146-g8ca5297e7e3 Bernhard Turmann <bernhard@turmann.eu> - 2021-05-03 19:20 +0200
    Bug#964734: reopened / test with 5.12.0-11146-g8ca5297e7e3 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-10-17 15:10 +0200
      Bug#964734: reopened / test with 5.12.0-11146-g8ca5297e7e3 Bernhard Turmann <bernhard@turmann.eu> - 2021-10-18 17:00 +0200

#71202 — Bug#964734: reopened / test with 5.12.0-11146-g8ca5297e7e3

FromBernhard Turmann <bernhard@turmann.eu>
Date2021-05-03 19:20 +0200
SubjectBug#964734: reopened / test with 5.12.0-11146-g8ca5297e7e3
Message-ID<CaKoG-8q9-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hallo Salvatore,

Am 02.05.21 um 15:00 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
>> Reopened until the resolution is clarified upstream.
> Was there some further progress/clarification from upstream?
I just tested with 5.12.0-11146-g8ca5297e7e3 to no avail and reported 
the result upstream / asked for any update, if available.
Other than that, I am not much of any help here, I am afraid.

Regards
Berni

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#73451

FromSalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Date2021-10-17 15:10 +0200
Message-ID<D9e5j-5Ek-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#71202
Hi Bernhard,

On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 07:11:09PM +0200, Bernhard Turmann wrote:
> Hallo Salvatore,
> 
> Am 02.05.21 um 15:00 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> > > Reopened until the resolution is clarified upstream.
> > Was there some further progress/clarification from upstream?
> I just tested with 5.12.0-11146-g8ca5297e7e3 to no avail and reported the
> result upstream / asked for any update, if available.
> Other than that, I am not much of any help here, I am afraid.

Is this issue still present with a recent kernel from unstable or
bullseye-backports?

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#73465

FromBernhard Turmann <bernhard@turmann.eu>
Date2021-10-18 17:00 +0200
Message-ID<D9Chj-3Sn-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#73451
Hello Salvatore,

Am 17.10.21 um 14:56 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> Is this issue still present with a recent kernel from unstable or
> bullseye-backports?

Yes, unfortunately, I just tested with 5.14.9-2~bpo11+1 and can confirm 
the same issue.
(using "options ddbridge msi=1" still works as a workaround)

With Regards
Berni

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web