Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #72514 > unrolled thread

Bug#991631: nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

Contents

  Bug#991631: nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version Hector Oron <zumbi@debian.org> - 2021-07-29 12:30 +0200
    Processed: Re: Bug#991631: nfs-utils: please update to newer  upstream version "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2021-07-29 13:50 +0200
    Bug#991631: nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-07-29 13:50 +0200
      Bug#991631: nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org> - 2021-09-04 09:30 +0200
        Bug#991631: nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version Hector Oron <zumbi@debian.org> - 2021-09-04 15:00 +0200
          Bug#991631: nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org> - 2021-09-05 17:40 +0200
            Bug#991631: nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-09-05 17:50 +0200
              Bug#991631: nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org> - 2021-09-05 18:30 +0200
                Bug#991631: nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-09-07 18:10 +0200
    Bug#991631: marked as done (nfs-utils: please update to newer  upstream version) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2021-09-06 12:10 +0200
    Bug#991631: marked as done (nfs-utils: please update to newer  upstream version) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2021-09-06 12:10 +0200
    Bug#991631: marked as done (nfs-utils: please update to newer  upstream version) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2021-09-06 12:10 +0200
    Bug#991631: marked as done (nfs-utils: please update to newer  upstream version) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2021-09-06 12:10 +0200

#72514 — Bug#991631: nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version

Package: src:nfs-utils
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

Hello,

  nfs-utils package is quite old, even in SID, what are the plans for
this package? Could it be updated to a more recent upstream version?

Regards,
-- 
 Héctor Orón  -.. . -... .. .- -.   -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#72515 — Processed: Re: Bug#991631: nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version

Processing control commands:

> forcemerge 917706 991631
Bug #917706 [src:nfs-utils] nfs-utils: New upstream release available
Bug #933998 [src:nfs-utils] Please update nfs-utils
Bug #952446 [src:nfs-utils] nfs-utils: Please update to latest nfs-utils
Bug #991631 [src:nfs-utils] nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version
The source nfs-utils and version 1.3.4-2.5+b1 do not appear to match any binary packages
Marked as found in versions nfs-utils/1.3.4-2.5+b1 and nfs-utils/1:1.3.4-2.3.
Bug #933998 [src:nfs-utils] Please update nfs-utils
Bug #952446 [src:nfs-utils] nfs-utils: Please update to latest nfs-utils
Merged 917706 933998 952446 991631

-- 
917706: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917706
933998: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933998
952446: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952446
991631: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991631
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72516

Control: forcemerge 917706 991631

Hi Hector,

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 12:21:47PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> Package: src:nfs-utils
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> Hello,
> 
>   nfs-utils package is quite old, even in SID, what are the plans for
> this package? Could it be updated to a more recent upstream version?

It should absolutely, there was an attempt to try to do this before
the bullseye release, but it failed, WIP in
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/nfs-utils/-/merge_requests/3 .
Some help welcome!

Debian is lacking too much behind. For after the bullseye release this
shouldbe tackled ASAP, we should not land in the same situation again
for bookworm.

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72791

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021, 21:42 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> wrote:

> Control: forcemerge 917706 991631
>
> Hi Hector,
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 12:21:47PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> > Package: src:nfs-utils
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >   nfs-utils package is quite old, even in SID, what are the plans for
> > this package? Could it be updated to a more recent upstream version?
>
> It should absolutely, there was an attempt to try to do this before
> the bullseye release, but it failed, WIP in
> https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/nfs-utils/-/merge_requests/3 .
> Some help welcome!
>
> Debian is lacking too much behind. For after the bullseye release this
> shouldbe tackled ASAP, we should not land in the same situation again
> for bookworm.
>
> Regards,
> Salvatore
>

Hello Salvatore, Héctor,

Just to let you know that I have been working with version 2.5.4 and the
2.5.5 RCs for the last few days, almost full time. Currently, I'm reviewing
once again all the patches.

Kind regards,

Aníbal

>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72792

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hello Anibal,

El ds., 4 de set. 2021, 9:33, Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
va escriure:

> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021, 21:42 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Control: forcemerge 917706 991631
>>
>> Hi Hector,
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 12:21:47PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
>> > Package: src:nfs-utils
>> > Severity: wishlist
>> >
>> > Dear Maintainer,
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> >   nfs-utils package is quite old, even in SID, what are the plans for
>> > this package? Could it be updated to a more recent upstream version?
>>
>> It should absolutely, there was an attempt to try to do this before
>> the bullseye release, but it failed, WIP in
>> https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/nfs-utils/-/merge_requests/3 .
>> Some help welcome!
>>
>> Debian is lacking too much behind. For after the bullseye release this
>> shouldbe tackled ASAP, we should not land in the same situation again
>> for bookworm.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Salvatore
>>
>
> Hello Salvatore, Héctor,
>
> Just to let you know that I have been working with version 2.5.4 and the
> 2.5.5 RCs for the last few days, almost full time. Currently, I'm reviewing
> once again all the patches.
>

Excellent! I worked on it sometime, but my work is not ready, I should post
it once it is ready for review and testing.

Anibal, do you have some WIP you can publish (on salsa) for review and/or
testing?

I feel we are pretty close for a real update. :-)

Thanks all for the work


> Kind regards,
>
> Aníbal
>
>>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72804

On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:47 PM Hector Oron <zumbi@debian.org> wrote:
> El ds., 4 de set. 2021, 9:33, Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org> va escriure:
>>
>> Hello Salvatore, Héctor,
>>
>> Just to let you know that I have been working with version 2.5.4 and the 2.5.5 RCs for the last few days, almost full time. Currently, I'm reviewing once again all the patches.
>
> Excellent! I worked on it sometime, but my work is not ready, I should post it once it is ready for review and testing.
>
> Anibal, do you have some WIP you can publish (on salsa) for review and/or testing?
>
> I feel we are pretty close for a real update. :-)
>
> Thanks all for the work

I uploaded nfs-utils 1:2.5.4-1~exp1 to experimental. Please try it.
I'm using it right now.

I plan to keep working on it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72805

Hi Anibal,

On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 01:31:35AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:47 PM Hector Oron <zumbi@debian.org> wrote:
> > El ds., 4 de set. 2021, 9:33, Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org> va escriure:
> >>
> >> Hello Salvatore, Héctor,
> >>
> >> Just to let you know that I have been working with version 2.5.4 and the 2.5.5 RCs for the last few days, almost full time. Currently, I'm reviewing once again all the patches.
> >
> > Excellent! I worked on it sometime, but my work is not ready, I should post it once it is ready for review and testing.
> >
> > Anibal, do you have some WIP you can publish (on salsa) for review and/or testing?
> >
> > I feel we are pretty close for a real update. :-)
> >
> > Thanks all for the work
> 
> I uploaded nfs-utils 1:2.5.4-1~exp1 to experimental. Please try it.
> I'm using it right now.
> 
> I plan to keep working on it.

Great thank you, and from now on I guess it will be much easier to
keep on track.

Can you please push the changes to the packaging repository?

https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/nfs-utils/

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72810

On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 1:46 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 01:31:35AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:47 PM Hector Oron <zumbi@debian.org> wrote:
> > > El ds., 4 de set. 2021, 9:33, Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org> va escriure:
> > >>
> > >> Hello Salvatore, Héctor,
> > >>
> > >> Just to let you know that I have been working with version 2.5.4 and the 2.5.5 RCs for the last few days, almost full time. Currently, I'm reviewing once again all the patches.
> > >
> > > Excellent! I worked on it sometime, but my work is not ready, I should post it once it is ready for review and testing.
> > >
> > > Anibal, do you have some WIP you can publish (on salsa) for review and/or testing?
> > >
> > > I feel we are pretty close for a real update. :-)
> > >
> > > Thanks all for the work
> >
> > I uploaded nfs-utils 1:2.5.4-1~exp1 to experimental. Please try it.
> > I'm using it right now.
> >
> > I plan to keep working on it.
>
> Great thank you, and from now on I guess it will be much easier to
> keep on track.
>
> Can you please push the changes to the packaging repository?
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/nfs-utils/

Sure.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72845

Hey Anibal,

On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 02:17:52AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 1:46 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 01:31:35AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:47 PM Hector Oron <zumbi@debian.org> wrote:
> > > > El ds., 4 de set. 2021, 9:33, Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org> va escriure:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hello Salvatore, Héctor,
> > > >>
> > > >> Just to let you know that I have been working with version 2.5.4 and the 2.5.5 RCs for the last few days, almost full time. Currently, I'm reviewing once again all the patches.
> > > >
> > > > Excellent! I worked on it sometime, but my work is not ready, I should post it once it is ready for review and testing.
> > > >
> > > > Anibal, do you have some WIP you can publish (on salsa) for review and/or testing?
> > > >
> > > > I feel we are pretty close for a real update. :-)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks all for the work
> > >
> > > I uploaded nfs-utils 1:2.5.4-1~exp1 to experimental. Please try it.
> > > I'm using it right now.
> > >
> > > I plan to keep working on it.
> >
> > Great thank you, and from now on I guess it will be much easier to
> > keep on track.
> >
> > Can you please push the changes to the packaging repository?
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/nfs-utils/
> 
> Sure.

And thanks as well for 1:2.5.4-1~exp2. Can you please still push the
changes? For tagging the releases we usually use the scripts/d-k-tag
from https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/kernel-team .

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72823 — Bug#991631: marked as done (nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version)

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2021 10:00:10 +0000
with message-id <E1mNBQA-0008Pg-9Z@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#991631: fixed in nfs-utils 1:2.5.4-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #991631,
regarding nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
991631: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991631
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72829 — Bug#991631: marked as done (nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version)

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2021 10:00:10 +0000
with message-id <E1mNBQA-0008PT-89@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#933998: fixed in nfs-utils 1:2.5.4-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #933998,
regarding nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
933998: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933998
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72832 — Bug#991631: marked as done (nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version)

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2021 10:00:10 +0000
with message-id <E1mNBQA-0008PY-8p@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#952446: fixed in nfs-utils 1:2.5.4-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #952446,
regarding nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
952446: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952446
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#72834 — Bug#991631: marked as done (nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version)

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2021 10:00:10 +0000
with message-id <E1mNBQA-0008PO-7O@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#917706: fixed in nfs-utils 1:2.5.4-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #917706,
regarding nfs-utils: please update to newer upstream version
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
917706: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917706
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel

csiph-web