Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #70190 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Bastian Germann <bastiangermann@fishpost.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-04-20 21:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2021-04-30 15:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 8 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
Bug#987281: linux-image-amd64: Enable i915 HDCP 2.2 support Bastian Germann <bastiangermann@fishpost.de> - 2021-04-20 21:10 +0200
Bug#987281: linux-image-amd64: Enable i915 HDCP 2.2 support Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-04-21 07:30 +0200
Bug#987281: linux-image-amd64: Enable i915 HDCP 2.2 support Bastian Germann <bastiangermann@fishpost.de> - 2021-04-29 19:10 +0200
Bug#987281: linux-image-amd64: Enable i915 HDCP 2.2 support Vincent Blut <vincent.debian@free.fr> - 2021-04-29 20:20 +0200
Bug#987281: linux-image-amd64: Enable i915 HDCP 2.2 support Bastian Germann <bastiangermann@fishpost.de> - 2021-04-30 09:20 +0200
Bug#987281: linux-image-amd64: Enable i915 HDCP 2.2 support Vincent Blut <vincent.debian@free.fr> - 2021-04-30 12:50 +0200
Bug#987281: linux-image-amd64: Enable i915 HDCP 2.2 support Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-04-30 13:50 +0200
Bug#987281: linux-image-amd64: Enable i915 HDCP 2.2 support Vincent Blut <vincent.debian@free.fr> - 2021-04-30 15:00 +0200
| From | Bastian Germann <bastiangermann@fishpost.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-04-20 21:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#987281: linux-image-amd64: Enable i915 HDCP 2.2 support |
| Message-ID | <C63UZ-6yY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Package: linux-image-amd64 Severity: wishlist Since Linux 5.6, CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_HDCP is available which allows to use HDCP 2.2 with i915 graphics. The HDCP support for AMD GPUs is already enabled (CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_HDCP=y). Having this available in the kernel config would improve support for various video streaming services and enable full use of package intel-hdcp. Its README claims CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_TXE must be available as well, which might be an outdated information. Please enable both CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_HDCP and CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_TXE as modules.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-04-21 07:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <C6dAZ-4eH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #70190 |
Hi Bastian, On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 08:57:02PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > Package: linux-image-amd64 > Severity: wishlist > > Since Linux 5.6, CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_HDCP is available which allows to use HDCP > 2.2 with i915 graphics. The HDCP support for AMD GPUs is already enabled > (CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_HDCP=y). > > Having this available in the kernel config would improve support for various > video streaming services and enable full use of package intel-hdcp. Its > README claims CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_TXE must be available as well, which might be > an outdated information. > > Please enable both CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_HDCP and CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_TXE as modules. Were you able to verify that enabling those two as modules make it work? The time for changes for bullseye is thight, so would like to hear a confirmation, the needed changed could be tested and confirmed to work. Many thanks in advance already, Regards, Salvatore
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bastian Germann <bastiangermann@fishpost.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-04-29 19:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <C9ikN-57h-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #70194 |
Am 21.04.21 um 07:24 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso: > Were you able to verify that enabling those two as modules make it > work? I honestly do not know how to check from userspace. xrandr has a Content Protection flag that is responsible for enabling/indicating HDCP usage. It works but I cannot verify it to be HDCP v2.2 (v1.4 works without those configs). libhdcpsdk has a HDCPSetProtectionLevel but I do not have the time right now to write a test program. > The time for changes for bullseye is thight, so would like to hear a > confirmation, the needed changed could be tested and confirmed to > work.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vincent Blut <vincent.debian@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-04-29 20:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <C9jqx-5IM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #70922 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi, Le 2021-04-29 19:01, Bastian Germann a écrit : > Am 21.04.21 um 07:24 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso: > > Were you able to verify that enabling those two as modules make it > > work? > > I honestly do not know how to check from userspace. xrandr has a Content > Protection flag that is responsible for enabling/indicating HDCP usage. It > works but I cannot verify it to be HDCP v2.2 (v1.4 works without those > configs). libhdcpsdk has a HDCPSetProtectionLevel but I do not have the time > right now to write a test program. Running 'xrandr --verbose' from Xorg should give you the supported HDCP Content Type. If that reports "HDCP Type1" then support for HDCP 2.2 is enabled. Cheers, Vincent
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bastian Germann <bastiangermann@fishpost.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-04-30 09:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <C9vBn-4Fe-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #70923 |
Am 29.04.21 um 20:13 schrieb Vincent Blut: > Running 'xrandr --verbose' from Xorg should give you the supported > HDCP Content Type. If that reports "HDCP Type1" then support for HDCP 2.2 is > enabled. Works as expected. Enabling the two configs is sufficient.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vincent Blut <vincent.debian@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-04-30 12:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <C9ySB-6si-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #70929 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Le 2021-04-30 09:12, Bastian Germann a écrit : > Am 29.04.21 um 20:13 schrieb Vincent Blut: > > Running 'xrandr --verbose' from Xorg should give you the supported > > HDCP Content Type. If that reports "HDCP Type1" then support for HDCP 2.2 is > > enabled. > > Works as expected. Enabling the two configs is sufficient. Thanks for confirming. Salvatore, how do you feel about enabling those kernel options for Bullseye? Should I open a MR?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-04-30 13:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <C9zOF-6ZH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #70931 |
Hi Vincent, On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 12:43:22PM +0200, Vincent Blut wrote: > Le 2021-04-30 09:12, Bastian Germann a écrit : > > Am 29.04.21 um 20:13 schrieb Vincent Blut: > > > Running 'xrandr --verbose' from Xorg should give you the supported > > > HDCP Content Type. If that reports "HDCP Type1" then support for HDCP 2.2 is > > > enabled. > > > > Works as expected. Enabling the two configs is sufficient. > > Thanks for confirming. > > Salvatore, how do you feel about enabling those kernel options for Bullseye? > Should I open a MR? As it was verified to work and it adds important additional hardware support, then yes please. I just find at this stage the part very important, we should try to enable additional HW support only if we have some verification that it adds value for the users, this is why I mentioned it last time. Regards, Salvatore
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vincent Blut <vincent.debian@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-04-30 15:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <C9AUq-7AJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #70932 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Le 2021-04-30 13:41, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit : > Hi Vincent, > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 12:43:22PM +0200, Vincent Blut wrote: > > Le 2021-04-30 09:12, Bastian Germann a écrit : > > > Am 29.04.21 um 20:13 schrieb Vincent Blut: > > > > Running 'xrandr --verbose' from Xorg should give you the supported > > > > HDCP Content Type. If that reports "HDCP Type1" then support for HDCP 2.2 is > > > > enabled. > > > > > > Works as expected. Enabling the two configs is sufficient. > > > > Thanks for confirming. > > > > Salvatore, how do you feel about enabling those kernel options for Bullseye? > > Should I open a MR? > > As it was verified to work and it adds important additional hardware > support, then yes please. Done. https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/354 > I just find at this stage the part very important, we should try to > enable additional HW support only if we have some verification that it > adds value for the users, this is why I mentioned it last time. Definitely agree! > Regards, > Salvatore Cheers, Vincent
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web