Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #69059 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ajoy Aswadhati <ajoy@uber.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-01-06 00:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2021-01-07 10:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
Building perf tool and packaging it into linux-tools Ajoy Aswadhati <ajoy@uber.com> - 2021-01-06 00:10 +0100
Re: Building perf tool and packaging it into linux-tools Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@debian.org> - 2021-01-06 08:20 +0100
Re: Building perf tool and packaging it into linux-tools Ajoy Aswadhati <ajoy@uber.com> - 2021-01-06 19:40 +0100
Re: Building perf tool and packaging it into linux-tools Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@debian.org> - 2021-01-07 10:10 +0100
| From | Ajoy Aswadhati <ajoy@uber.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-06 00:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Building perf tool and packaging it into linux-tools |
| Message-ID | <Bu3CG-1vL-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi Team, Can someone suggest the recommended way to build the "perf" tool and package it into linux-tools*? I have been using a modified version (done internally at Uber) provided in this patch: https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2015/04/msg00013.html This patch doesn't apply properly to newer Kernel releases. Since this is a common requirement, I am wondering if there is an alternate solution that does not require the above mentioned patch. -- Thanks -ajoy
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-06 08:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BubgR-6pd-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #69059 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 15:07 -0800, Ajoy Aswadhati wrote: > Hi Team, > > Can someone suggest the recommended way to build the "perf" tool and > package it into linux-tools*? > For the Debian shipped Linux kernel, there's the linux-perf package which will pull in the proper linux-perf-$VERSION of the package for the respective Linux kenrel. > I have been using a modified version (done internally at Uber) > provided in > this patch: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2015/04/msg00013.html > > This patch doesn't apply properly to newer Kernel releases. > > Since this is a common requirement, I am wondering if there is an > alternate > solution that does not require the above mentioned patch. > -- Given the large number of mailing lists I follow, I request you to CC me in replies for quicker response
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ajoy Aswadhati <ajoy@uber.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-06 19:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BulSW-4nC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #69061 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi Ritesh, Thank you for your prompt response. I am building kernel 5.10, for Buster which is not the default version that is shipped. If you can send me pointers on how to build the linux-perf package that is part of the official distribution that would be great. Thanks -ajoy On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 11:17 PM Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 15:07 -0800, Ajoy Aswadhati wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > Can someone suggest the recommended way to build the "perf" tool and > > package it into linux-tools*? > > > > For the Debian shipped Linux kernel, there's the linux-perf package > which will pull in the proper linux-perf-$VERSION of the package for > the respective Linux kenrel. > > > I have been using a modified version (done internally at Uber) > > provided in > > this patch: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2015/04/msg00013.html > > > > This patch doesn't apply properly to newer Kernel releases. > > > > Since this is a common requirement, I am wondering if there is an > > alternate > > solution that does not require the above mentioned patch. > > > > -- > Given the large number of mailing lists I follow, I request you to CC > me in replies for quicker response > -- Thanks -ajoy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-07 10:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BuzsS-4A8-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #69068 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Wed, 2021-01-06 at 10:29 -0800, Ajoy Aswadhati wrote: > Hi Ritesh, > > Thank you for your prompt response. I am building kernel 5.10, for > Buster which is not the default version that is shipped. > If you can send me pointers on how to build the linux-perf package > that is part of the official distribution that would be great. There's the fine documentation, Debian Kernel Handbook. https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-kernel-handbook/ It is also available as a package in Debian. Have a look at it. And like any other package, feel free to enhance it by sending bug reports, bug fixes and new docuemnt sections. Thanks, Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web