Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #69696 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mateusz Łącki <mateusz.lacki@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-03-04 14:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2021-03-04 14:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#983885: Mateusz Łącki <mateusz.lacki@gmail.com> - 2021-03-04 14:20 +0100
| From | Mateusz Łącki <mateusz.lacki@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-03-04 14:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#983885: |
| Message-ID | <BOW3w-6Mm-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
It seems to me that passing "crashkernel=1024M nmi_watchdog=1 crashkernel=384M-:128M” as a kernel boot parameter makes the system way more stable (but this is based on fairly short test period - perhaps 6 times the expected failure time). Best, Mateusz
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web