Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #67365 > unrolled thread

Initramfs-tools boot issue with bad console

Started by"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@canonical.com>
First post2020-06-24 14:20 +0200
Last post2020-07-08 14:10 +0200
Articles 4 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel


Contents

  Initramfs-tools boot issue with bad console "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@canonical.com> - 2020-06-24 14:20 +0200
    Re: Initramfs-tools boot issue with bad console Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@canonical.com> - 2020-07-03 22:50 +0200
      Re: Initramfs-tools boot issue with bad console Michael Prokop <mika@debian.org> - 2020-07-08 09:20 +0200
        Re: Initramfs-tools boot issue with bad console Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@canonical.com> - 2020-07-08 14:10 +0200

#67365 — Initramfs-tools boot issue with bad console

From"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@canonical.com>
Date2020-06-24 14:20 +0200
SubjectInitramfs-tools boot issue with bad console
Message-ID<AlcxI-3tn-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Debian Kernel team, I'd like to discuss a long-term issue that was
reported in both Debian and Ubuntu. Booting a system with a bad console
may cause a boot loop condition on initram scripts, if an invalid
console output is set.

Recently there was two Debian bugs reported: [0] and [1] (the latter
reported by me, the former by Jonas). Also, I've proposed a simple fix
through the following merge request:
salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/30 .

Thanks in advance for the attention.
Cheers,


Guilherme


[0] bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960355
[1] bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962545

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#67456

FromGuilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@canonical.com>
Date2020-07-03 22:50 +0200
Message-ID<AoANb-af-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#67365
Thanks for your +1 there Michael! Do you know if there's a way to get
that merged? I'd like to follow the proper process and fix that on
Debian before Ubuntu.

Also, just for my knowledge for future submissions: is it better to
send a patch via email, as an attachment in a bug report message, than
a merge request in salsa? I'd like to follow the procedure that is
preferred by the maintainers.
Thanks,


Guilherme

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#67485

FromMichael Prokop <mika@debian.org>
Date2020-07-08 09:20 +0200
Message-ID<Aqcx3-3yB-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#67456

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi,

* Guilherme Piccoli [Fri Jul 03, 2020 at 05:29:52PM -0300]:

> Thanks for your +1 there Michael! Do you know if there's a way to get
> that merged? I'd like to follow the proper process and fix that on
> Debian before Ubuntu.

I'm not sure if Ben is watching/noticing Salsa MRs, Ben?

Guilherme, you already added the patch to #962545 (excellent and
thanks :)), that's where Ben should notice it for sure. :)

> Also, just for my knowledge for future submissions: is it better to
> send a patch via email, as an attachment in a bug report message, than
> a merge request in salsa? I'd like to follow the procedure that is
> preferred by the maintainers.
> Thanks,

I'm no longer active in the initramfs-tools maintenance, so I'll
leave that answer to Ben (and possible further/upcoming maintainers
of i-t).

regards
-mika-

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#67487

FromGuilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@canonical.com>
Date2020-07-08 14:10 +0200
Message-ID<Aqh3H-6iw-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#67485
Thanks a lot Mika! I'll try to add patches to BTS and Salsa, I think
this way is more easy for maintainers, to choose what they prefer
heheh
Cheers,


Guilherme

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web