Testing migration of linux

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.kernel
Subject	Testing migration of linux
Date	Fri, 23 Aug 2019 17:50:01 +0200
Message-ID	<yyjZ7-5lb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-release-request@lists.debian.org Fri Aug 23 15:41:36 2019
Old-Return-Path	<ben@decadent.org.uk>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-12.063 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -4.6
Content-Type	multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6q2h5nX4Q/9nApb79PsV"
User-Agent	Evolution 3.30.5-1.1
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Sa-Exim-Connect-IP	167.98.27.226
X-Sa-Exim-Mail-From	ben@decadent.org.uk
X-Sa-Exim-Scanned	No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Mailing-List	<debian-release@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/126146
List-ID	<debian-release.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/272487a75e81550c9dd40b5d419a39d97f0fc86b.camel@decadent.org.uk
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	73
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	Debian kernel maintainers <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>, cross-toolchain-base-devs@lists.launchpad.net
X-Original-Date	Fri, 23 Aug 2019 16:41:05 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<272487a75e81550c9dd40b5d419a39d97f0fc86b.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.devel.release:90264 linux.debian.kernel:64903

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

We now have a version of linux (5.2.9-2) that builds on all release
architectures and doesn't seem to cause build regressions for other
packages.  I think that this should migrate to testing soon, as the
version in testing is missing important security fixes.

I'm aware of autopkgtest regressions for two packages:

* cross-toolchain-base 36: This appears to be a bug in that version of
the package.  cross-toolchain-base version 39 seems to be compatible
with Linux 5.2 and would need to migrate at the same time.

* glibc 2.28-10: This is a minor regression in the kernel uAPI headers,
which could *possibly* lead to build failures if programs define
conflicting macros.  (I fixed the larger regression which did cause
build failures.)  glibc 2.29 as packaged in experimental will stop
using these uAPI headers.

The excuses file mentions "new bug" #934483, but that was a bug in
virtualbox-guest-dkms which has now been fixed.  virtualbox is not in
testing.

So these packages should migrate to testing together:

cross-toolchain-base 39
linux 5.2.9-2
linux-latest 106
linux-signed-amd64 5.2.9+2
linux-signed-arm64 5.2.9+2
linux-signed-i386 5.2.9+2

cross-toolchain-base seems to be dependent on these packages, which
also inter-depend on each other, so that they'll also need to migrate
at the same time:

binutils
gcc-8
gcc-9-cross-ports
gcc-defaults-ports

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame someone else.

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Testing migration of linux Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2019-08-23 17:50 +0200
  Re: [Cross-toolchain-base-devs] Testing migration of linux Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com> - 2019-08-23 22:40 +0200

csiph-web