Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #63085

Re: linux-image-4.19.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 unsigned only?

From Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.kernel
Subject Re: linux-image-4.19.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 unsigned only?
Date 2019-01-16 20:20 +0100
Message-ID <xgYTg-211-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <xgLCF-2oG-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Wed, 2019-01-16 at 18:03 +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> Sorry if I missed previous discussion on this.
> 
> I seem to only see linux-image-4.19.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-unsigned (and the
> virtual package) for this version? Is that deliberate?

No.  The signed packages are built from separate source packages that
need to be separately approved for inclusion in the archive.  That just
happened in the last few hours.

> (There are cloud, rt and dbg packages as well)
> 
> This seems to also result in the kernel being tainted (8192 - An
> unsigned module has been loaded in a kernel supporting module
> signature); or is that unrelated?

This is expected if you install the unsigned packages (or an out-of-
tree module).

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Unix is many things to many people,
but it's never been everything to anybody.


Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

linux-image-4.19.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 unsigned only? Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2019-01-16 06:10 +0100
  Re: linux-image-4.19.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 unsigned only? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2019-01-16 20:20 +0100

csiph-web