Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #63779
| From | shirish शिरीष <shirishag75@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Why don't we have linux-5.0 instead of 4.19.0-4 which is the running kernel in Debian 'buster' i.e. testing ? |
| Date | 2019-04-06 04:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <xJJ61-6HL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Dear Kernel team,
Please CC as I'm not subscribed to the list .
I saw the following news item few days back -
https://news.softpedia.com/news/linux-kernel-4-20-reaches-end-of-life-users-urged-to-upgrade-to-linux-5-0-525461.shtml
http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1903.2/02285.html
Currently we are using 4.19.0-4 according to the lastest updated
systems on buster .
$ uname -r
4.19.0-4-amd64
I see that 4.20 has been taken out of the archive and the 5.0 is there
but in experimental -
$ apt-cache policy linux-image-5.0.0-trunk-amd64
linux-image-5.0.0-trunk-amd64:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 5.0.2-1~exp1
Version table:
5.0.2-1~exp1 1
1 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian experimental/main
amd64 Packages
What's stopping it to move to unstable and have an unblock and be for buster ?
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
E493 D466 6D67 59F5 1FD0 930F 870E 9A5B 5869 609C
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why don't we have linux-5.0 instead of 4.19.0-4 which is the running kernel in Debian 'buster' i.e. testing ? shirish शिरीष <shirishag75@gmail.com> - 2019-04-06 04:20 +0200 Re: Why don't we have linux-5.0 instead of 4.19.0-4 which is the running kernel in Debian 'buster' i.e. testing ? Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2019-04-06 08:30 +0200
csiph-web