Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #62757
| From | Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] tracing: Use strlcpy() instead of strcpy() in __trace_find_cmdline() |
| Date | 2018-12-17 22:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <x68sV-3fy-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <x67nb-2Cy-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <x67nb-2Cy-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <x67nb-2Cy-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <x67nb-2Cy-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <x67nb-2Cy-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 08:42:38PM +0100, Loic wrote: >Le 2018-12-17 09:19, Greg KH a écrit : >>On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 09:08:20PM +0100, Loic wrote: >>>Le 2018-12-16 20:27, Steven Rostedt a écrit : >>>> On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 09:52:33 +0100 >>>> Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 06:25:37PM +0100, Loic wrote: >>>> > > Hello, >>>> > > >>>> > > Please picked up this patch for linux 4.4 and 4.9. >>>> > > This fixes CVE-2017-0605 (Rejected?). Tested in Debian ;) >>>> > >>>> > It was rejected as a CVE for a good reason, and that reason is also >>>> > why >>>> > I refused to add it to the stable kernel releases. In short, this is >>>> > not an issue or bug at all, there is nothing wrong with the existing >>>> > code. >>>> > >>>> >>>> I'm starting to regret that I ever accepted the original patch :-( >>>> >>>> -- Steve >>> >>>Okay, I hadn't looked at the previous conversations because this >>>change is >>>in the upstream and in debian... >> >>Upstream is fine, it's a valid change so that people don't keep sending >>the crazy patch over and over. >> >>Debian is just cargo-culting the thing and should probably drop it >>as it >>keeps coming back to me every 3 months or so, and I have to reject it >>again :( >> >>thanks, >> >>greg k-h > >Why didn't you follow the upstream or add a comment "no change for >fake CVE-2017-0605" to break the debian patch ? This change is fine upstream, it doesn't even mention that CVE. It just doesn't actually fix anything, so it doesn't belong in stable (nor is it tagged for stable). -- Thanks, Sasha
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] tracing: Use strlcpy() instead of strcpy() in __trace_find_cmdline() Loic <hackurx@opensec.fr> - 2018-12-17 21:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tracing: Use strlcpy() instead of strcpy() in __trace_find_cmdline() Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> - 2018-12-17 22:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tracing: Use strlcpy() instead of strcpy() in __trace_find_cmdline() Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2018-12-17 22:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tracing: Use strlcpy() instead of strcpy() in __trace_find_cmdline() Loic <hackurx@opensec.fr> - 2018-12-18 19:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tracing: Use strlcpy() instead of strcpy() in __trace_find_cmdline() Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-12-18 04:10 +0100
csiph-web