Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #62630

Bug#846950: Please explain what broke nfs-utils for you (Debian Bug #846950)

From Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Bug#846950: Please explain what broke nfs-utils for you (Debian Bug #846950)
Date 2018-12-02 18:10 +0100
Message-ID <x0DpM-5lQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sKGAp-nV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <x0A8x-38n-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sKGAp-nV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <x0A8x-38n-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Gaudenz,

On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 5:39 AM Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@debian.org> wrote:

> But you did not
> explain how this broke your installation in a way that you think
> this is release critical.

For privilege separation, I keep different keytabs in a directory
/etc/keytabs/. This is an alternative setup to keeping all keytabs in
a file /etc/krb.keytab. One of the scripts you ship
(/lib/systemd/system/rpc-svcgssd.service) requires

ConditionPathExists=/etc/krb5.keytab

That prevents rpc-svcgssd.service from running and any NFSv4 volumes
from being mounted. It breaks the essential function of the package.

> I agree that supporting all variables and possible configuration
> variants that are supported by the sysvinit scripts on systemd is
> a worthwile goal. I don't think this in itself is a release
> critical bug.  You can always use systemd native methods like
> drop-in configuration snippets to achieve your goal.

I am fan of systemd but still trying to understand its features. A
quick reference would be much appreciated.

> I'm downgrading the severity again at the moment, please feel free
> to upgrade again with an explanation how this actually breaks your
> system in a way that is not just a misconfiguration.

Together with #849942, this bug broke my installation on every package
update since I filed or amended the reports almost two years ago.

The developer guidelines for level 'grave' state: "makes the package
in question unusable or mostly so" [1]. I therefore disagree with your
reassignment.

I also would be happy to spend some time on this package. I promise I
won't just fix my own bugs. :)

Felix
--
GPG: F04D 1C22 02E2 FA0D 0188  54DA AC58 A94F 1161 8EE0

[1] https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#846950: Please explain what broke nfs-utils for you (Debian Bug #846950) Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@debian.org> - 2018-12-02 14:40 +0100
  Bug#846950: Please explain what broke nfs-utils for you (Debian Bug #846950) Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> - 2018-12-02 18:10 +0100

csiph-web