Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #60231
| From | Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [stretch] ABI bump for 4.9 with retpoline support? |
| Date | 2018-02-17 21:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vkgOl-2Vg-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <vjLUd-7UK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vjS9j-3Bb-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <vkgOl-2Vg-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sat, 2018-02-17 at 19:51 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I think we should bump ABI again. Thanks for the feedback. I'll do that and remove all the ABI reverts and ignores. > We should also do the equivalent of > these changes in sid, with s/gcc-7/gcc-6/. > > * [x86] Add versioned build-dependency on gcc-7 for retpoline support > * [x86] linux-compiler-gcc-7-x86: Add versioned dependency on gcc-7 for > retpoline support > * [x86] linux-headers: Depend on updated linux-compiler-gcc-7-x86 I did the linux-compiler-gcc-6-x86 one but not the other two, Will do as well. Should we upload this one through security-master (for the CVE-2017-5715 fix) or through stretch-pu again? Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[stretch] ABI bump for 4.9 with retpoline support? Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> - 2018-02-16 12:00 +0100
Re: [stretch] ABI bump for 4.9 with retpoline support? Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> - 2018-02-16 18:40 +0100
Re: [stretch] ABI bump for 4.9 with retpoline support? Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> - 2018-02-17 21:00 +0100
Re: [stretch] ABI bump for 4.9 with retpoline support? Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2018-02-18 12:20 +0100
Re: [stretch] ABI bump for 4.9 with retpoline support? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-02-17 21:00 +0100
csiph-web