Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #61175

Re: "external abort on linefetch (0x814)" on Kirkwood 6282 SoC

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Newsgroups linux.debian.ports.arm, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Re: "external abort on linefetch (0x814)" on Kirkwood 6282 SoC
Date Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:40:01 +0200
Message-ID <vYNc5-2e9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <vIrfz-5fE-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <vSV2F-7oJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <vSYtA-1a8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <vU2lr-ed-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <vUt2i-18Z-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <vWdZ7-66G-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vWh6G-7OQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <vWjLc-V9-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <vWkHf-1tr-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <vYKnT-Aj-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-arm-request@lists.debian.org Sat Jun 9 14:39:20 2018
Old-Return-Path <andrew@lunn.ch>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_FROM_MX=-3.1; rate: -6.1
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=+ocvOedvkgmaf6WAW+kDykwBSo46tZI674zUwzCXUBs=; b=U/yb4+3bqQKv8JT1BmPiGjcz8V8lrTnQQpGb0MWjQmCgJvbipvqAG0v+KZVmsBaNBi/kOP6P2D/mMneKst9nossSGhJlAvnv/1SXEx5Kviy1tPuY/2UuXeLlFYuPx7wNaZSC0+VNQOhjs1UAbnYVJlOpHi9JLK+Za76cpDzzOu4=;
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition inline
User-Agent Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Mailing-List <debian-arm@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/21175
List-ID <debian-arm.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20180609142324.GB4482@lunn.ch
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 27
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc Timo Jyrinki <timo.jyrinki@gmail.com>, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, RobJE Debian ARM <f2985a762f2ea45f9f1ce1339ad4318b@renf.us>, Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>, debian-kernel <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Sat, 9 Jun 2018 16:23:24 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <20180609142324.GB4482@lunn.ch>
X-Original-References <20180425111628.2uif7xwekc6le5s5@jirafa.cyrius.com> <CAJtFfxnA7_9L1ybrzDYzksXaMnm_+HECMr0KuHXf2B19c4_zpA@mail.gmail.com> <20180524123026.GA24557@lunn.ch> <34b43db9-7574-843b-8ecf-674b74367ce9@renf.us> <20180528160033.GB27177@lunn.ch> <CAJtFfxkq+w7WXpd2XFM2JV48=6t=JU5ChzhPfSGg7T16NhG4wA@mail.gmail.com> <1527954913.2070.74.camel@debian.org> <CAJtFfxnLEvckUDF=GTdXvR0d67ydDEQZ3mJRkdmqhnQYkPWF5Q@mail.gmail.com> <20180602193108.GB29326@lunn.ch> <1528543859.8198.23.camel@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.ports.arm:10859 linux.debian.kernel:61175

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


> With only 1G of physical RAM anything using the full 3G would be
> already so far into swapping hell that it seems like it would be pretty
> unusable. So maybe we can assert that it is unlikely that there is any
> real world usage that would be impacted by this change.

Hi Ian

That was what i was thinking. In theory, one of the kirkwood SoCs can
have 2GB of RAM. But i've not seen many 1G machines, let alone 2G.

> Debian uses a Marvell specific kernel, so we don't need to worry about
> the impact on other platforms.

That i was not sure about. Are there any plans to merge all ARM v5
kernels together? Then this would affect more machines.

> > Or do we need to figure out why highmem breaks on Kirkwood?
> 
> I guess it would be nice from an upstream PoV to know what was going on
> -- in particular in case there were to be other more subtle side
> effects or corruption possible.

I might be able to hack together a 3.5/0.5G split, so forcing some of
the 512MB of RAM i have in my Kirkwood into highmem. Hopefully i can
then reproduce the issue.

     Andrew

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: "external abort on linefetch (0x814)" on Kirkwood 6282 SoC Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org> - 2018-06-09 13:40 +0200
  Re: "external abort on linefetch (0x814)" on Kirkwood 6282 SoC Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2018-06-09 16:40 +0200
    Re: "external abort on linefetch (0x814)" on Kirkwood 6282 SoC Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org> - 2018-06-09 18:20 +0200
      Re: "external abort on linefetch (0x814)" on Kirkwood 6282 SoC Damien <damien@makelofine.org> - 2018-07-03 23:00 +0200
        Re: "external abort on linefetch (0x814)" on Kirkwood 6282 SoC Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> - 2018-07-03 23:30 +0200
          Re: "external abort on linefetch (0x814)" on Kirkwood 6282 SoC Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2018-07-04 21:10 +0200
            Re: "external abort on linefetch (0x814)" on Kirkwood 6282 SoC Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> - 2018-07-04 22:30 +0200
            Re: "external abort on linefetch (0x814)" on Kirkwood 6282 SoC Timo Jyrinki <timo.jyrinki@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 09:00 +0200

csiph-web