Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #59793

Bug#885575: md: potentially incorrect warnings about alignment

From Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Bug#885575: md: potentially incorrect warnings about alignment
Date 2017-12-28 09:40 +0100
Message-ID <v1BTj-5WH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Package: linux
Version: 4.13.13-1~bpo9+1

Looking at the output of dmesg, I see warnings like this:


md0: Warning: Device sde3 is misaligned


Checking the same disk with parted tells me it is aligned correctly:


# parted /dev/sde
GNU Parted 3.2
Using /dev/sde
Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.
(parted) align-check optimal 3                                           
3 aligned



Checking the disk with "fdisk -l" shows me:


# fdisk -l /dev/sde

Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes



When the same disk is attached through a USB HDD dock, the "fdisk -l"
output gives a different value for optimal I/O size:


# fdisk -l /dev/sdb

Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 33553920 bytes

=> 33553920 / 512 = 65535 sectors of 512 bytes


When I partitioned the disk, I used MiB alignment (multiple of 2048
sectors of 512 bytes each)

Is the warning from the md kernel module misleading or is parted
align-check wrong?  Can the warning be made more verbose to indicate why
it believes the partition is not aligned correctly?

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#885575: md: potentially incorrect warnings about alignment Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro> - 2017-12-28 09:40 +0100

csiph-web