Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #58834

Bug#872726: linux: apparmor doesn't use proper audit event ids

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!news.unit0.net!news.panservice.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Bug#872726: linux: apparmor doesn't use proper audit event ids
Date Sun, 03 Sep 2017 13:10:02 +0200
Message-ID <ulAWS-7Ee-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ugzRL-8iD-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ugzRL-8iD-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Sun Sep 3 11:03:13 2017
Old-Return-Path <debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
X-Spam-Flag NO
X-Spam-Score -4.2
Reply-To intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>, 872726@bugs.debian.org
Resent-To debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
X-Debian-Pr-Message followup 872726
X-Debian-Pr-Package src:linux
X-Debian-Pr-Keywords upstream
X-Debian-Pr-Source linux
X-Spam-Bayes score:0.5 spammytokens: hammytokens:
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
X-Debian-Message from BTS
X-Mailing-List <debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1401243
List-ID <debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist/>
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 19
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc 872726@bugs.debian.org
X-Original-Date Sun, 03 Sep 2017 13:01:29 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <85y3pwnj06.fsf@boum.org>
X-Original-References <150324017505.17911.12302073458142650371.reportbug@fornost.bigon.be> <150324017505.17911.12302073458142650371.reportbug@fornost.bigon.be>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:847593 linux.debian.kernel:58834

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


Hi Laurent!

Laurent Bigonville:
> IMVHO, in regard to the recent proposal of enabling apparmor in debian
> by default, this needs to be addressed first.

I'm genuinely curious why this should be a blocker for Debian: this is
not obvious to me as a number of distros could enable AppArmor by
default and can apparently live with this bug.

Can you please make it explicit, e.g. describing what exact use cases
would be harmed by enabling AppArmor by default without fixing this
bug first?

Thanks in advance!

Cheers,
-- 
intrigeri

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#872726: linux: apparmor doesn't use proper audit event ids Laurent Bigonville <bigon@debian.org> - 2017-08-20 17:00 +0200
  Bug#872726: linux: apparmor doesn't use proper audit event ids Vincas Dargis <vindrg@gmail.com> - 2017-08-20 19:10 +0200
  Bug#872726: linux: apparmor doesn't use proper audit event ids Vincas Dargis <vindrg@gmail.com> - 2017-08-20 19:10 +0200
  Bug#872726: linux: apparmor doesn't use proper audit event ids intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org> - 2017-09-03 13:10 +0200
    Bug#872726: linux: apparmor doesn't use proper audit event ids Laurent Bigonville <bigon@debian.org> - 2017-09-04 14:40 +0200
      Bug#872726: linux: apparmor doesn't use proper audit event ids intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org> - 2017-09-09 19:30 +0200
        Bug#872726: linux: apparmor doesn't use proper audit event ids John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> - 2017-09-09 22:20 +0200

csiph-web