Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #59468
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request |
| Date | 2017-11-23 00:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uOMjv-5PN-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <uyJfZ-5Uo-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <uyKF3-74D-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <uzTPY-2RZ-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <uzTZT-34a-445@gated-at.bofh.it> <uGH7l-3XU-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 15:58 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: [...] > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 09:48:46PM -0300, Helen Koike wrote: [...] > > Is this solution acceptable? If we have an easy way to revoke, then we > > can easily undo an attacker's work. We can sign everything automatically > > (if the package is in a whitelist) without the need for the ftp masters > > to review each upload manually. > > Right. Wanting to go the revocation route would depend on the > development of yet more new software features. But: this is not > something that any of the other SB-supporting distros seem to be > caring about so far so I don't think it's something we should have to > implement as a pre-requisite. [...] As I understand it, SUSE has implemented some kind of downgrade prevention. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers. - Leonard Brandwein
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com> - 2017-10-05 20:30 +0200
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com> - 2017-10-09 03:20 +0200
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-10-09 15:10 +0200
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2017-10-09 18:40 +0200
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> - 2017-10-09 18:50 +0200
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-10-09 20:10 +0200
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar@debian.org> - 2017-10-13 00:10 +0200
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com> - 2017-10-13 00:20 +0200
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2017-10-31 17:00 +0100
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com> - 2017-11-15 14:50 +0100
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 00:20 +0100
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2017-11-23 17:30 +0100
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 00:10 +0100
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-23 00:10 +0100
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2017-11-23 17:30 +0100
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-22 23:10 +0100
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> - 2017-11-24 21:00 +0100
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2017-10-13 00:50 +0200
Re: Secure boot signing infrastructure - feedback request Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-22 23:20 +0100
csiph-web