Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #59315

Bug#880203: closed by Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#880203: After suspend&resume, cpufreq/scaling_max_freq is ignored)

From Leon Meier <Leon.Meier@yandex.ru>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Bug#880203: closed by Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#880203: After suspend&resume, cpufreq/scaling_max_freq is ignored)
Date 2017-11-01 14:00 +0100
Message-ID <uH0MG-sS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <uGDZL-2db-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <uGDZL-2db-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <uH0CZ-nP-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uGjHJ-6Nr-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <uH0CZ-nP-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 01.11.2017 13:38, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 13:25:11 +0100 Leon Meier <Leon.Meier@yandex.ru> wrote:
>> On 31.10.2017 11:39, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>>> Yes, but that doesn't mean we can do anything about it.
>>
>> Why not simply re-issue the request setting the performance-level after
>> resume?
> 
> The driver does that.
> 
> 
Oh. But in this case the effect of this action is not visible on my machine.

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#880203: After suspend&resume, cpufreq/scaling_max_freq is ignored Leon Meier <Leon.Meier@yandex.ru> - 2017-10-30 16:00 +0100
  Processed: Re: Bug#880203: After suspend&resume, cpufreq/scaling_max_freq  is ignored owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) - 2017-10-31 01:30 +0100
  Bug#880203: After suspend&resume, cpufreq/scaling_max_freq is ignored Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-10-31 01:30 +0100
    Bug#880203: After suspend&resume, cpufreq/scaling_max_freq is ignored Leon Meier <Leon.Meier@yandex.ru> - 2017-10-31 11:20 +0100
  Bug#880203: marked as done (After suspend&resume, cpufreq/scaling_max_freq  is ignored) owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) - 2017-10-31 11:40 +0100
  Bug#880203: closed by Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#880203: After suspend&resume, cpufreq/scaling_max_freq is ignored) Leon Meier <Leon.Meier@yandex.ru> - 2017-10-31 13:40 +0100
    Bug#880203: After suspend&resume, cpufreq/scaling_max_freq is ignored - (wild hack) shell script Leon Meier <Leon.Meier@yandex.ru> - 2017-11-01 13:20 +0100
      Bug#880203: After suspend&resume, cpufreq/scaling_max_freq is ignored - (wild hack) shell script Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-01 13:50 +0100
    Bug#880203: closed by Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#880203: After suspend&resume, cpufreq/scaling_max_freq is ignored) Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-11-01 13:50 +0100
      Bug#880203: closed by Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#880203: After suspend&resume, cpufreq/scaling_max_freq is ignored) Leon Meier <Leon.Meier@yandex.ru> - 2017-11-01 14:00 +0100
  Bug#880203: After suspend&resume, cpufreq/scaling_max_freq is ignored - alternative shell script Leon Meier <Leon.Meier@yandex.ru> - 2017-11-01 14:40 +0100

csiph-web