Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #56896
| From | Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.devel.release |
| Subject | Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2 |
| Date | 2017-02-04 11:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t75ip-75K-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t33yx-1f4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <t75ip-75K-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 04/02/17 10:50, Niels Thykier wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > CC'ing the maintainer of nfs-common and the reporter of #848306. > > Robbie Harwood: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: unblock >> >> Please unblock package gssproxy >> >> gssproxy has been 10 days in unstable, and allowing it to migrate will fix >> bug#848306 (severity: important) in nfs-common. gssproxy is a new package in >> unstable (so no debdiff is included), and would have made the freeze had I not >> made a mistake documenting copyright. >> >> Thanks. >> >> unblock gssproxy/0.5.1-2 >> >> [...] > Hi, > > Thanks for bringing this up. > > Is this migration from rpc.svcgssd to gssproxy so important (release > critical) that it ought to be granted an exception? And if so, why is it > that important (despite #848306 not being release critical)? Upstream is not really supporting rpc.svcgssd any more, they actually disabled it in the build so people can still have it as a transitional measure in stretch. People shouldn't be using it in any new installations. Offering them gssproxy is a very sensible thing to do. Regards, Daniel
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2 Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2017-02-04 11:00 +0100
Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2 Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro> - 2017-02-04 11:00 +0100
Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2 Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2017-02-04 11:10 +0100
Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2 Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2017-03-05 19:50 +0100
Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2 Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro> - 2017-03-05 20:20 +0100
Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> - 2017-03-20 06:30 +0100
Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2 Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2017-04-05 12:50 +0200
Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2 Robbie Harwood <rharwood@club.cc.cmu.edu> - 2017-04-06 01:50 +0200
Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2 Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2017-04-09 21:50 +0200
Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2 Robbie Harwood <rharwood@club.cc.cmu.edu> - 2017-04-11 07:40 +0200
csiph-web