Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #54970

Bug#831827: linux: arm64 support for securelevel and Secure Boot

From Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Bug#831827: linux: arm64 support for securelevel and Secure Boot
Date 2016-08-30 20:20 +0200
Message-ID <sbVND-8n7-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rWLQd-1rn-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <saTkR-1fy-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sbBvz-3DB-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 01:30:44PM -0700, Linn Crosetto wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:22:52PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 pending
> > 
> > Applied, but:
> > 
> > > 
> > > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c
> > > @@ -139,6 +139,13 @@ efi_status_t update_fdt(efi_system_table_t
> > > *sys_table, void *orig_fdt,
> > >  			return efi_status;
> > >  		}
> > >  	}
> > > +
> > > +	fdt_val32 = efi_get_secureboot(sys_table);
> > 
> > Shouldn't there be a cpu_to_fdt32() conversion here?
> 
> Yes. When setting securelevel the check to see if secure_boot is
> greater-than-zero behaves the same, but it should be byte-swapped to preserve
> the value returned by efi_get_secureboot(). I tested and validated the
> following change:
> 
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ efi_status_t update_fdt(efi_system_table_t *sys_table, void *orig_fdt,
>                 }
>         }
>  
> -       fdt_val32 = efi_get_secureboot(sys_table);
> +       fdt_val32 = cpu_to_fdt32(efi_get_secureboot(sys_table));
>         status = fdt_setprop(fdt, node, "linux,uefi-secure-boot",
>                              &fdt_val32, sizeof(fdt_val32));
>         if (status)

Attaching version 2 of the patches with the change.

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#831827: linux: arm64 support for securelevel and Secure Boot Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> - 2016-07-20 00:40 +0200
  Bug#831827: linux: arm64 support for securelevel and Secure Boot Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-08-27 23:30 +0200
    Bug#831827: linux: arm64 support for securelevel and Secure Boot Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> - 2016-08-29 22:40 +0200
      Bug#831827: linux: arm64 support for securelevel and Secure Boot Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> - 2016-08-30 20:20 +0200
        Bug#831827: linux: arm64 support for securelevel and Secure Boot Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-09-04 03:30 +0200
  Processed: Re: Bug#831827: linux: arm64 support for securelevel  and Secure Boot owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) - 2016-08-27 23:30 +0200
  Processed: Re: Bug#831827: linux: arm64 support for securelevel  and Secure Boot owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) - 2016-08-27 23:40 +0200
  Bug#831827: linux: arm64 support for securelevel and Secure Boot Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-08-27 23:40 +0200

csiph-web