Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #53514

Bug#820567: kexec on mipsel partially broken between ckt20 and ckt25

From Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Bug#820567: kexec on mipsel partially broken between ckt20 and ckt25
Date 2016-04-10 11:20 +0200
Message-ID <rmjHc-2L7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rmcw1-5PO-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Control: reassign -1 src:linux 3.16.7-ckt25-1

On Sat, 2016-04-09 at 18:31 -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> Package: linux-source-3.16
> Version: 3.16.7-ckt25-1~bpo70+1
> 
> Between 3.16.7-ctk20 and 3.16.7-ctk25 the kexec functionality of the
> Linux kernel was damaged.  The system I'm looking at uses a 3.3 kernel
> to load the "real" kernel off a filesystem and kexec into that.  The 3.3
> kernel was able to successfully kexec into a 3.16.7-ctk20 kernel, but
> is unable to kexec into a 3.16.7-ctk25 kernel.  However I found the
> 3.16.7-ctk20 IS able to successfully kexec the 3.16.7-ctk25 kernel.

Surely this is a bug in the built-in (3.3) kernel, not the new one?  If
there's something simple that can be done in the Debian kernel to work
around this, we should do that, but otherwise you're stuck with this.

> Doing a double-kexec does work around the issue, but it means I need to
> hold onto that one magic kernel for the moment...
> 
> In other news, it appears sometime between 3.3 and 3.10 there started
> being a requirement for GCC 4.8 on mipsel.

Packages in jessie must be buildable using compiler versions in jessie.
That means either gcc-4.8 or gcc-4.9.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
I'm always amazed by the number of people who take up solipsism because
they heard someone else explain it. - E*Borg on alt.fan.pratchett

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#820567: kexec on mipsel partially broken between ckt20 and ckt25 Elliott Mitchell <ehem+debian@m5p.com> - 2016-04-10 03:40 +0200
  Bug#820567: kexec on mipsel partially broken between ckt20 and ckt25 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-04-10 11:20 +0200
    Bug#820567: kexec on mipsel partially broken between ckt20 and ckt25 Elliott Mitchell <ehem+debian@m5p.com> - 2016-04-10 20:20 +0200
      Bug#820567: kexec on mipsel partially broken between ckt20 and ckt25 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-04-10 21:00 +0200
        Bug#820567: kexec on mipsel partially broken between ckt20 and ckt25 Elliott Mitchell <ehem+debian@m5p.com> - 2016-04-10 23:40 +0200
          Bug#820567: kexec on mipsel partially broken between ckt20 and ckt25 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-04-11 02:40 +0200
            Bug#820567: kexec on mipsel partially broken between ckt20 and ckt25 Elliott Mitchell <ehem+debian@m5p.com> - 2016-04-11 08:00 +0200
  Processed: Re: Bug#820567: kexec on mipsel partially broken  between ckt20 and ckt25 owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) - 2016-04-10 11:20 +0200
  Processed: Re: Bug#820567: kexec on mipsel partially broken  between ckt20 and ckt25 owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) - 2016-04-10 21:00 +0200
  Bug#820567: marked as done (kexec on mipsel partially broken  between ckt20 and ckt25) owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) - 2016-04-11 13:40 +0200

csiph-web