Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #51290

Bug#803739: cosmetic: /initrd.img /vmlinuz smylinks - absolute vs. relative

From Marco <lists@homerow.info>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Bug#803739: cosmetic: /initrd.img /vmlinuz smylinks - absolute vs. relative
Date 2015-11-12 09:00 +0100
Message-ID <qtUXw-62X-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 06:23:56 +0100 Christoph Anton Mitterer
<calestyo@scientia.net> wrote:

I also stumbled upon the fact that /vmlinuz is a relative link (as
it should be) and /initrd.img is an absolute link while building a
PXE environment.

> This is absolutely just cosmetic ;-)

Others also noticed the same thing and the absolute link is an issue
e.g. in PXE and VM environments. See

  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692333#29

and

  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763653#5

> Unless this has some secret reason,... it may be aligned for
> cosmetic reasons.

I don't think it's purely cosmetic because people have issues with
the absolute links. I fail to see a reason why an absolute link
should be better, but someone might prove me wrong. And after all
this issue is more than three years old:

  #692333, #763653

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#803739: cosmetic: /initrd.img /vmlinuz smylinks - absolute vs. relative Marco <lists@homerow.info> - 2015-11-12 09:00 +0100

csiph-web