Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #51290
| From | Marco <lists@homerow.info> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#803739: cosmetic: /initrd.img /vmlinuz smylinks - absolute vs. relative |
| Date | 2015-11-12 09:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qtUXw-62X-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 06:23:56 +0100 Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net> wrote: I also stumbled upon the fact that /vmlinuz is a relative link (as it should be) and /initrd.img is an absolute link while building a PXE environment. > This is absolutely just cosmetic ;-) Others also noticed the same thing and the absolute link is an issue e.g. in PXE and VM environments. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692333#29 and https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763653#5 > Unless this has some secret reason,... it may be aligned for > cosmetic reasons. I don't think it's purely cosmetic because people have issues with the absolute links. I fail to see a reason why an absolute link should be better, but someone might prove me wrong. And after all this issue is more than three years old: #692333, #763653
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#803739: cosmetic: /initrd.img /vmlinuz smylinks - absolute vs. relative Marco <lists@homerow.info> - 2015-11-12 09:00 +0100
csiph-web