Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #93239

Bug#1141434: [waldi@debian.org: Bug#1141434: linux-image-6.12.94+deb13-amd64: regression in loop devices]

Show all headers | View raw

----- Forwarded message from Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> -----

Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 08:50:35 +0200
From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
To: 1141434@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#1141434: linux-image-6.12.94+deb13-amd64: regression in loop
 devices
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 tagged_above=-9999 required=6.31
 tests=[DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled
Reply-To: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>, 1141434@bugs.debian.org

Control: tag -1 moreinfo

On Sat, Jul 04, 2026 at 10:08:13PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> (2026-07-04):
> > On Sat, Jul 04, 2026 at 07:27:29PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > >     root@iot-isobuilder-52:~# fallocate -l 1G foo.img
> > >     root@iot-isobuilder-52:~# kpartx -asv foo.img
> > Why kpartx and not losetup -P?  kpartx uses device mapper, while losetup
> > -P uses the internal partition support of the kernel.
> That's been working for me for many years, and I never noticed losetup
> -P until today. kpartx also happens to be what's used by vmdb2 in
> various recipes, including the basis for that particular image build.

Please try replacing kpartx with losetup.

Bastian

-- 
Pain is a thing of the mind.  The mind can be controlled.
		-- Spock, "Operation -- Annihilate!" stardate 3287.2


----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
The best diplomat I know is a fully activated phaser bank.
		-- Scotty

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1141434: linux-image-6.12.94+deb13-amd64: regression in loop devices Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2026-07-04 19:30 +0200
  Bug#1141434: linux-image-6.12.94+deb13-amd64: regression in loop devices Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2026-07-04 21:30 +0200
    Bug#1141434: linux-image-6.12.94+deb13-amd64: regression in loop devices Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2026-07-04 23:10 +0200
  Bug#1141434: linux-image-6.12.94+deb13-amd64: regression in loop devices Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2026-07-04 22:00 +0200
    Bug#1141434: linux-image-6.12.94+deb13-amd64: regression in loop devices Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2026-07-04 22:10 +0200
      Bug#1141434: linux-image-6.12.94+deb13-amd64: regression in loop devices Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2026-07-06 09:00 +0200
        Bug#1141434: linux-image-6.12.94+deb13-amd64: regression in loop devices Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2026-07-31 19:40 +0200
  Processed: Re: Bug#1141434: linux-image-6.12.94+deb13-amd64:  regression in loop devices "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2026-07-06 09:00 +0200
  Bug#1141434: [waldi@debian.org: Bug#1141434: linux-image-6.12.94+deb13-amd64: regression in loop devices] Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2026-07-06 15:00 +0200

csiph-web