Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #88561
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#1108294: [PATCH 4/4] cgroup: Do not report unavailable v1 controllers in /proc/cgroups |
| Date | 2025-07-27 17:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Ldb10-38nz-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <L1sqB-d0on-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LaTBf-1xB3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <L1sqB-d0on-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LaTBf-1xB3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hi, On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 09:42:23AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > Applied to cgroup/for-6.17. > > I would recommend to follow upstream for kernels beyond > Trixie in this aspect. Debian needs a workaround for kernel > 6.12 in Trixie, because there are no JDKs fully compatible > with cgroupv2 yet, including the brand-new > > OpenJDK 11.0.28 > OpenJDK 17.0.16 > OpenJDK 21.0.8 > > released a few days ago. I expect the JDKs will be fixed for > Forky. This would be my "personal" (in terms of keeping deltas in the packaging) preference: - make sure the patches get backported down to 6.12.y - drop our local revert - make uses affected made aware of the kernel parameter to use (maybe via a NEWS entry?) I had a short discussion on IRC with Ben about that, and as the upstream changes are not yet down to 6.12.y the situation is rather clear that we have the revert. If the changes goes down to 6.12.y though I would love to rediscuss if we could consider the above instread. I though realize it is too early to at all consider, given it's not yet applied upsream. Regards, Salvatore
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1108294: kernel 6.12 breaks cgroup awareness of openjdk 21 Harald Dunkel <harri@afaics.de> - 2025-06-25 09:10 +0200
Bug#1108294: kernel 6.12 breaks cgroup awareness of openjdk 21 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2025-06-26 18:30 +0200
Bug#1108294: kernel 6.12 breaks cgroup awareness of openjdk 21 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2025-06-26 19:20 +0200
Bug#1108294: kernel 6.12 breaks cgroup awareness of openjdk 21 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2025-07-09 00:50 +0200
Bug#1108294: kernel 6.12 breaks cgroup awareness of openjdk 21 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2025-07-09 14:00 +0200
Bug#1108294: kernel 6.12 breaks cgroup awareness of openjdk 21 Harald Dunkel <harri@afaics.de> - 2025-06-26 20:50 +0200
Bug#1108294: kernel 6.12 breaks cgroup awareness of openjdk 21 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2025-06-29 14:30 +0200
Bug#1108294: kernel 6.12 breaks cgroup awareness of openjdk 21 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2025-06-26 18:50 +0200
Bug#1108294: kernel 6.12 breaks cgroup awareness of openjdk 21 Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2025-06-26 20:30 +0200
Processed: Re: kernel 6.12 breaks cgroup awareness of openjdk 21 "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2025-07-09 00:50 +0200
Bug#1108294: marked as done (kernel 6.12 breaks cgroup awareness of openjdk 21) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2025-07-11 09:10 +0200
Bug#1108294: [PATCH 4/4] cgroup: Do not report unavailable v1 controllers in /proc/cgroups Harald Dunkel <harri@afaics.de> - 2025-07-14 08:30 +0200
Bug#1108294: [PATCH 4/4] cgroup: Do not report unavailable v1 controllers in /proc/cgroups Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.com> - 2025-07-21 10:00 +0200
Bug#1108294: [PATCH 4/4] cgroup: Do not report unavailable v1 controllers in /proc/cgroups Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-07-27 17:00 +0200
Bug#1108294: 洗澡最危险 寒冬“10大易猝死行为”曝光 Alan Zhou <avianrobles359@gmail.com> - 2025-09-19 03:20 +0200
csiph-web