Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #90176
| Path | csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Roman Savochenko <roman@oscada.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#1118349: dpm broken on Radeon HD 8570D |
| Date | Fri, 21 Nov 2025 10:20:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <LTvt7-eBaH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <LQkaR-cqL3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <LQh3j-coFQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <LQkaR-cqL3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LSWc1-ecyM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <LHcmd-65Ut-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <LSWc1-ecyM-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <LSWc1-ecyM-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <LTvt7-eBaH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <LTvt7-eBaH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <LTvt7-eBaH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <LTvt7-eBaH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <LHcmd-65Ut-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <LTvt7-eBaH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Fri Nov 21 09:13:09 2025 |
| Old-Return-Path | <debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org> |
| X-Spam-Flag | NO |
| X-Spam-Score | -1.699 |
| Reply-To | Roman Savochenko <roman@oscada.org>, 1118349@bugs.debian.org |
| Resent-To | debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org |
| Resent-Cc | debian-kernel@lists.debian.org |
| X-Debian-Pr-Message | followup 1118349 |
| X-Debian-Pr-Package | src:linux |
| X-Debian-Pr-Keywords | moreinfo upstream |
| X-Debian-Pr-Source | linux |
| Content-Type | multipart/mixed; boundary="------------3XeXJjGTD8CF2ny8z3oS0FCT" |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| User-Agent | Mozilla Thunderbird |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| Organization | OpenSCADA Team |
| X-Debian-Message | from BTS |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1937892 |
| List-ID | <debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist/> |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 137 |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | 1118349@bugs.debian.org, Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>, "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>, "amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org> |
| X-Original-Date | Fri, 21 Nov 2025 11:11:39 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <f3b685d2-bb09-481f-bb54-3ef75613ccb7@oscada.org> |
| X-Original-References | <f689f22a-f53a-435a-b79c-d79b4cfd810c@oscada.org> <2qxsyt34y4gmwuxwyvs7qh6ekypair6mt3h7n5txdhletjnpsc@vygqxoo7oacn> <e0d85321-733d-4b89-ba5f-5efd5f1b18ac@oscada.org> <931c33cf-26cd-4d23-827d-8c61f9028ca9@amd.com> <176078292467.2932.7155687538828443067.reportbug@home.home> <389a9e45-0f92-4810-a8ed-91640750d973@oscada.org> <jkkqfvey7b6evfq6ojj7nldwka6a2s5y32ehybyoi47nfn25ck@hqh7d2zrvlr3> <ef917b90-3ed3-4c57-8af8-12012e1dfc1e@oscada.org> <qgdse6s2nzjfdbiudf5xv54mtg3tz2jopyvzijfn4vcdoxxlkr@xm56p5qrjndb> <cd316805-65a9-4f78-96bc-4ced6226db1a@oscada.org> <pipwh3hfkzm24t3qxknkpj44d3esmr7g46ldjgreb2357qmzra@7fekfuwv6udi> <176078292467.2932.7155687538828443067.reportbug@home.home> <pipwh3hfkzm24t3qxknkpj44d3esmr7g46ldjgreb2357qmzra@7fekfuwv6udi> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1271033 linux.debian.kernel:90176 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi, Uwe Kleine-König 21.11.25 10:35, Uwe Kleine-König: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 06:45:48PM +0200, Roman Savochenko wrote: >> 20.11.25 10:38, Uwe Kleine-König: >>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 08:23:31PM +0200, Roman Savochenko wrote: >>>> 19.11.25 19:05, Uwe Kleine-König: >>>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 06:19:07PM +0200, Roman Savochenko wrote: >>>>>> 12.11.25 17:03, Christian König: >>>>>>> On 11/12/25 15:28, Roman Savochenko wrote: >>>>>>>> 12.11.25 13:14, Uwe Kleine-König: >>>>>>>>>> On my hardware that doesn't work and there is no specific. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Now just I set "radeon.dpm=1", I got immediately restart with disabling USB, >>>>>>>>>> so I have needed to restart for successful download with "radeon.dpm=0". >>>>>>>>> Can you try a different monitor? >>>>>>>> I have only one, connected through DVI, and there is no problem on Linux Kernel 5. >>>>>>> Kernel 5 what? E.g. which concrete version number? (output of uname -a). >>>>>> user@debian:~$ cat /proc/version >>>>>> >>>>>> Linux version 5.10.0-32-amd64 (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc-10 >>>>>> (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2) >>>>>> #1 SMP Debian 5.10.223-1 (2024-08-10) >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Can you try which Debian kernel was the last one working fine respective >>>>>>>>> the first being broken in this regard? You can find all kernels on >>>>>>>>> https://snapshot.debian.org/. Please ask if it's unclear how to do that. >>>>>>>> I can try all kernels in Debian starting 7 and finishing 13, but I have traced that before and the problem reproduction started from Debian 9, terminated on Debian 11 and renewed on Debian 12. >>>>> Not sure I follow. Does that mean that Debian 9, Debian 10, Debian 12 >>>>> and Debian 13 show the symptom and Debian 11 doesn't? >>>> Yes, and in kernels that is 4, 6 show the symptom and 3, 5 don't. >>> I think this statement isn't helpful unless you're saying that Linux >>> 5.19 was good and 6.0 was bad. Kernel versions started with 5 between >>> 2019-03-03 and 2022-07-31, not taking stable releases into account. And >>> there are 294457 commits in that range >>> (`git rev-list v5.0..v5.19 | wc -l`). So "kernel 5" and "kernel 6" is a >>> bit too fuzzy to work with. >> OK, and what do you want from me? > Quoting an earlier mail in that thread: > > Can you try which Debian kernel was the last one working fine > respective the first being broken in this regard? You can find > all kernels on https://snapshot.debian.org/. Please ask if it's > unclear how to do that. I have told that as the kernel in Debian 11. >> Must I say you the exact commit or what, >> or you are waiting I must recompile all kernels with 294457 commits? >> >> I say you in what way the problem related through the stable kernels in >> Debian releases and that is exactly assigned to the major versions of the >> Linux kernel, even for broken v5.19 which can include backports from 6! > Yeah, you keep talking about Linux 3, 4, 5 and 6. These categories cover > several years of development each and thus are not helpful to locate the > change that broke your setup. Unless it is really 5.19 that was good and > 6.0 that is bad which limits the amount of changes from: I keep talking that only for understanding the problem depth and not for fixing that in 4 kernels! That is, there can be simpler to apply that workaround. > . This is still a lot and we might ask you to do more tests to further > limit the set of candidate commits that are broken on your end. OK, ask. >>> Can you please confirm that 5.19.x (e.g. a kernel package from >>> https://snapshot.debian.org/package/linux/5.19.11-1/) works fine and >>> 6.0.x (e.g.https://snapshot.debian.org/package/linux/6.0.12-1/) >>> doesn't? (Or a similar statement with other consecutive mainline >>> versions.) >> 5.19.0 has this problem in view of hanging. > You lost me here. What is "problem in view of hanging"? Are we talking > about more than one problem? Or different variants of the same problem? We talk about different variants, and the hanging I saw also on one 6 kernel just after installing Debian 13 and that is why #1118349 I opened about the hanging but not rebooting in the initial report #879992. >>> Note that even that might not be enough to spot the problem and you >>> might have to get your hands dirty then and compile development kernels >>> and test them. >> Note, my hands in that "dirty" are 22 years already and I hoped I will not >> get their at least on Linux kernel again — http://oscada.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Sub-projects/Automation_Linux_distributive >> . :) >> >> And I have resolved the problem for myself by the option "radeon.dpm=0" in >> all my Live Disks. If you want to tell that is my problem, throw it away and >> reject the workaround!:) > There might be a misconception about the roles involved here. > > In my eyes the situation is as follows: You have a problem. I have resolved the problem for myself far ago. > I (and possibly others) offer to help. To help for other with same hardware, since I can fix that for myself if I need. > For now your problem report isn't in a form that I can act upon. So it's in your interest to provide the > information that I ask for. If you don't want to do that, that's fine, > and I won't have sleepless nights about it. The likely outcome is that > the problem isn't addressed. Whether I don't provide you all information beyond "get my hand in the dirty"? :) > Parts of the misunderstanding here might also be a language barrier. So > maybe try to get some help in the kernel community that speaks your > native tongue. So, English isn't native one for you? :) Regards, Roman
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1118349: dpm broken on Radeon HD 8570D Roman Savochenko <roman@oscada.org> - 2025-11-21 10:20 +0100 Bug#1118349: dpm broken on Radeon HD 8570D Roman Savochenko <roman@oscada.org> - 2025-11-26 17:00 +0100
csiph-web