Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #88386
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Installation location of BPF vmlinux.h |
| Date | 2025-07-12 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <L7NVn-h96M-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi all,
Debian recently started added a linux-bpf-dev binary package that
installs the BPF header vmlinux.h at:
/usr/include/$DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH/linux/bpf/vmlinux.h
After we did this Luca noted that in Ubuntu the corresponding binary
package installs it at:
/usr/include/$DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH/linux/vmlinux.h
and as a result the systemd package needs to use distribution-
conditional logic to use this header.
We discussed this in a merge request
<https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1359>
(currently down, sorry) and also at a meeting on IRC
<https://meetbot.debian.net/debian-kernel/2025/debian-kernel.2025-04-02-19.00.log.html>.
The main argument for using <linux/bpf/vmlinux.h> is that it is less
likely to conflict with or be confused with a posible future UAPI header
installed at /usr/include/linux/vmlinux.h.
Would you consider moving this header in Ubuntu to align with Debian?
Or alternatively would you like to argue for the converse (Debian should
align with Ubuntu)?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Experience is directly proportional to the value of equipment destroyed
- Carolyn Scheppner
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Installation location of BPF vmlinux.h Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2025-07-12 21:20 +0200 Re: Installation location of BPF vmlinux.h Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@canonical.com> - 2025-07-28 10:30 +0200
csiph-web