Bug#1049873: closing 1049873

From	Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject	Bug#1049873: closing 1049873
Date	2025-02-12 09:00 +0100
Message-ID	<KffP3-gbcj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <Kf4Ah-g3DM-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <H3nYC-2gmc-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Kf6sq-g4M9-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <H3nYC-2gmc-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Kf6sq-g4M9-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:52:21PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Hey.
> 
> I think you misunderstood me:
> 
> Only the part where I thought that dCache showed the old size (after
> the move has happened, without hanging, when using a current kernel) is
> a non-issue.
> 
> The problem in 6.1.x, that mv hangs *is* still happening.

Yes my undsetstanding from your comments was that 6.12.13-1 does not
expose the problem. 

I have reopened the bug, but I believe the only one who actually can
do something here is either you, and bisect the changes down to what
broke the behaviour, or someone else using dCache and having the
possiblity to do experiments on a dedicated note.

I would start bisecting first by debian kernel-image packages by
narring down more closely where the behaviour got introduced, then
from there the respective upstream stable series changes.

I hope this gives you enough guide already on how to proceed.

Regards,
Salvatore

Thread

Bug#1049873: closing 1049873 Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.org> - 2025-02-11 23:00 +0100
  Bug#1049873: closing 1049873 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-02-12 09:00 +0100
    Bug#1049873: closing 1049873 Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.org> - 2025-02-14 01:20 +0100
      Bug#1049873: closing 1049873 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-02-14 06:50 +0100

csiph-web