Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #87378
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#1104460: [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking (was: Re: Bug#1104460: linux-image-6.1.0-34-powerpc64le: Discard broken) with RAID10: BUG: kernel tried to execute user page (0) - exploit attempt? |
| Date | 2025-05-05 18:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <KJ6yd-WJ1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <KHi0N-hnio-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KJ2Eh-U4I-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KJ6yd-WJ1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <KHh4J-hmHh-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KJ6yd-WJ1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 04:00:31PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Moritz,
>
> On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 01:47:15PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > Am Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 05:55:20PM +0200 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > We got a regression report in Debian after the update from 6.1.133 to
> > > 6.1.135. Melvin is reporting that discard/trimm trhough a RAID10 array
> > > stalls idefintively. The full report is inlined below and originates
> > > from https://bugs.debian.org/1104460 .
> >
> > JFTR, we ran into the same problem with a few Wikimedia servers running
> > 6.1.135 and RAID 10: The servers started to lock up once fstrim.service
> > got started. Full oops messages are available at
> > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/P75746
>
> Thanks for this aditional datapoints. Assuming you wont be able to
> thest the other stable series where the commit d05af90d6218
> ("md/raid10: fix missing discard IO accounting") went in, might you at
> least be able to test the 6.1.y branch with the commit reverted again
> and manually trigger the issue?
>
> If needed I can provide a test Debian package of 6.1.135 (or 6.1.137)
> with the patch reverted.
So one additional data point as several Debian users were reporting
back beeing affected: One user did upgrade to 6.12.25 (where the
commit was backported as well) and is not able to reproduce the issue
there.
This indicates we might miss some pre-requisites in the 6.1.y series?
user is trying now the 6.1.135 with patch reverted as well.
Regards,
Salvatore
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1104460: [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking (was: Re: Bug#1104460: linux-image-6.1.0-34-powerpc64le: Discard broken) with RAID10: BUG: kernel tried to execute user page (0) - exploit attempt? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-04-30 18:00 +0200
Bug#1104460: [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking (was: Re: Bug#1104460: linux-image-6.1.0-34-powerpc64le: Discard broken) with RAID10: BUG: kernel tried to execute user page (0) - exploit attempt? Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2025-05-05 14:00 +0200
Bug#1104460: [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking (was: Re: Bug#1104460: linux-image-6.1.0-34-powerpc64le: Discard broken) with RAID10: BUG: kernel tried to execute user page (0) - exploit attempt? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-05-05 18:10 +0200
Bug#1104460: [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking (was: Re: Bug#1104460: linux-image-6.1.0-34-powerpc64le: Discard broken) with RAID10: BUG: kernel tried to execute user page (0) - exploit attempt? Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2025-05-05 21:00 +0200
Bug#1104460: [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking (was: Re: Bug#1104460: linux-image-6.1.0-34-powerpc64le: Discard broken) with RAID10: BUG: kernel tried to execute user page (0) - exploit attempt? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-05-05 22:40 +0200
Bug#1104460: [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking (was: Re: Bug#1104460: linux-image-6.1.0-34-powerpc64le: Discard broken) with RAID10: BUG: kernel tried to execute user page (0) - exploit attempt? Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2025-05-05 23:10 +0200
Bug#1104460: [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> - 2025-05-06 03:40 +0200
Bug#1104460: [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-05-06 08:10 +0200
Bug#1104460: [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2025-05-06 15:20 +0200
Bug#1104460: [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking (was: Re: Bug#1104460: linux-image-6.1.0-34-powerpc64le: Discard broken) with RAID10: BUG: kernel tried to execute user page (0) - exploit attempt? Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2025-05-05 19:50 +0200
Bug#1104460: [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> - 2025-05-06 03:30 +0200
Bug#1104460: [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> - 2025-05-06 03:40 +0200
Bug#1104460: [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking (was: Re: Bug#1104460: linux-image-6.1.0-34-powerpc64le: Discard broken) with RAID10: BUG: kernel tried to execute user page (0) - exploit attempt? Melvin Vermeeren <vermeeren@vermwa.re> - 2025-05-06 17:30 +0200
csiph-web