Bug#1080975: upgrade 6.1.106 to 6.10.6 failed

From	Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject	Bug#1080975: upgrade 6.1.106 to 6.10.6 failed
Date	2024-09-06 19:20 +0200
Message-ID	<JjKMN-asQt-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<JjCvT-an2V-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JjCvT-an2V-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Control: reassign -1 udev

On Fri, 2024-09-06 at 10:19 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Package: linux-image-amd64
> Version: 6.10.6-1
> 
> Upgrading from 6.1.106 to 6.10.6 failed, because some network
> interfaces changed their names, eg.
> 
> 	enp49s0f1 --> enp49s0f1np1
[...]

This is a result of:

- The i40e driver adding support for the devlink_port API
- udev adding the port number from the devlink_port API in the
  device name even though there is only port per PCI function

[...]
> I would suggest to support the old-style names ("enp49s0f1")
> in parallel to the new names.

The kernel doesn't "support" any of these names; that's all done by
udev.  I'm reassigning this accordingly.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Time is nature's way of making sure that
everything doesn't happen at once.

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1080975: upgrade 6.1.106 to 6.10.6 failed Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.com> - 2024-09-06 10:30 +0200
  Processed: Re: Bug#1080975: upgrade 6.1.106 to 6.10.6 failed "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-09-06 19:20 +0200
  Bug#1080975: upgrade 6.1.106 to 6.10.6 failed Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-06 19:20 +0200

csiph-web