Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #84529
| From | Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#1086520: linux-image-6.11.2-amd64: makes opensm fail to start |
| Date | 2024-11-13 23:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <JItSp-8IDj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <JDIyK-5IMC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JHzQd-8aCr-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <JDIyK-5IMC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JHzQd-8aCr-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:22:26 +0100 Uwe Kleine-König wrote: [...] > Hello, Hi Uwe, thanks for your followup. > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 07:53:52PM +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote: [...] > > I filed this bug report against the Debian Linux kernel, in order > > to warn other users about this issue, and in order to ask the Debian > > Kernel Team to investigate the issue and/or to forward the bug report > > to the relevant upstream Linux kernel maintainers. > > > > Please do not reassign to package opensm with the intention of > > merging with bug [#1085300], unless you know for sure that the > > issue is in opensm and you know how to fix it. > > Please do not report multiple bugs for the same issue. The right(er) > thing to do is to make use of "affects". Now there are three bug reports > (2 for Debian and one upstream) and someone being aware of only one (or > two) of them, might miss some action which results in duplicate work. You are right, the "affects" field is the most appropriate means to show that a bug report against a given package also affects other packages. However, in this case, the lack of replies from opensm maintainers made me doubtful about the best possible course of action. Sorry about that. > > > Please help, I would very much like to run the head node with > > an up-to-date kernel! > > This is hard to act on without further input. Some questions to debug > this: > > I guess the kernel provides a directory "/sys/class/infiniband_mad". Do > its contents look different on 6.10.x and 6.11.x? I will look into this as soon as I can reboot the cluster head node. > > Can you please bisect the problem? [...] I have to find a time window where I can perform multiple reboots, which can result in a non-working InfiniBand network... It won't be easy, since the cluster has entered production and users keep launching jobs. Anyway, what I have done so far is: I have tried and rebuilt a Linux kernel image Debian package, following your instructions. After some failed attempts (due to missing dependencies and/or required tools), I think I succeeded, but I had to reply to a number of questions during the procedure: I have always replied with the default answer (by hitting [Enter]), I hope that was the right thing to do! Before I go on and try to install the resulting Debian package, could you please review the transcript of what I did (see the attached file)? Please bear with me, some of the questions were really obscure to me and I am not really familiar with the procedure: I think that the last time I rebuilt a Linux kernel image Debian package was some 15 years ago (I was still using the now-obsolete [kernel-package]!). [kernel-package]: <https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/kernel-package> Thanks for your time and for the help you are providing. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1086520: linux-image-6.11.2-amd64: makes opensm fail to start Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@debian.org> - 2024-11-11 11:30 +0100
Processed: Re: Bug#1086520: linux-image-6.11.2-amd64: makes opensm fail to start "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-11-11 11:30 +0100
Bug#1086520: linux-image-6.11.2-amd64: makes opensm fail to start Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> - 2024-11-13 23:20 +0100
Bug#1086520: linux-image-6.11.2-amd64: makes opensm fail to start Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@debian.org> - 2024-11-18 10:10 +0100
Bug#1086520: linux-image-6.11.2-amd64: makes opensm fail to start Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> - 2024-11-18 20:10 +0100
Bug#1086520: linux-image-6.11.2-amd64: makes opensm fail to start Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@debian.org> - 2024-11-21 11:10 +0100
Bug#1086520: linux-image-6.11.2-amd64: makes opensm fail to start Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> - 2024-11-25 20:00 +0100
Bug#1086520: linux-image-6.11.2-amd64: makes opensm fail to start Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> - 2024-11-26 08:30 +0100
Bug#1086520: linux-image-6.11.2-amd64: makes opensm fail to start Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> - 2024-11-27 19:00 +0100
csiph-web