Bug#1070083: linux: Do we still need sched-autogroup-disabled.patch in 2024?

From	Alex Volkov <alex@bootes.sytes.net>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject	Bug#1070083: linux: Do we still need sched-autogroup-disabled.patch in 2024?
Date	2024-04-29 23:40 +0200
Message-ID	<IyGT7-9U4o-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Source: linux
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

I can't see why something which can be done with a kernel boot parameter or a
sysctl variable
needs to be forced in the source since 2011. Also, the very existence of this
new default is non-transparent for anyone relying on official kernel
documentation. Is it even mentioned in any README or something? Because I
couldn't find anything.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (991, 'stable-updates'), (991, 'stable-security'), (991, 'stable'), (99, 'testing'), (90, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.6.13-bootes0-p-1000 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en_US
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1070083: linux: Do we still need sched-autogroup-disabled.patch in 2024? Alex Volkov <alex@bootes.sytes.net> - 2024-04-29 23:40 +0200
  Bug#1070083: linux: Do we still need sched-autogroup-disabled.patch in 2024? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-04-30 12:50 +0200
  Bug#1070083: marked as done (linux: Do we still need  sched-autogroup-disabled.patch in 2024?) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-06-28 00:20 +0200

csiph-web