Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #82017

Re: What to do with d-i on armel?

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.maint.boot, linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.ports.arm
Subject Re: What to do with d-i on armel?
Date Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:00:02 +0100
Message-ID <Ieed3-elht-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <IecuB-ekrK-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Gerardo Ballabio <gerardo.ballabio@gmail.com>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org Mon Mar 4 10:57:55 2024
Old-Return-Path <bunk@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-109.607 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.088, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition inline
X-Debian-User bunk
X-Mailing-List <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/142038
List-ID <debian-kernel.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ZeWlUcUxqC0N/9IW@localhost
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 24
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc Gianluca Renzi <icjtqr@gmail.com>, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Mon, 4 Mar 2024 12:41:21 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <ZeWlUcUxqC0N/9IW@localhost>
X-Original-References <CA+f80t6JHzegqa8DAp+weT4uA=zsvY2G7NXA5HeQkZ2kwpPaZg@mail.gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.kernel:82017 linux.debian.maint.boot:72199 linux.debian.devel.release:123140 linux.debian.ports.arm:13884

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 09:52:14AM +0100, Gerardo Ballabio wrote:
> Gianluca Renzi wrote:
> > The same here. We never used the d-i but we are using Debian systems (kernel and root file system) as daily bases of our line of products embedded systems. Hundred of thousands of boards are using Debian since Debian Lenny 5.0. From armel to armhf 32 bit systems.
> > So a drop of the armel and/or armhf will force us to a very complicated rearrangement of our build systems.
> > Please don't do that if you can.
> 
> Hi Gianluca,
> if that is so important for your business, you might consider
> sponsoring some work on this issue.
> The Debian Long Term Support project
> <https://www.freexian.com/lts/debian/> is about keeping "old stuff"
> working so that might be the right place to ask.

That's not the right place, LTS is about keeping *old Debian versions*
security supported for 2 additional years (and has dropped armel since stretch).

LTS is not doing anything at all regarding keeping older/unusual 
hardware supported, such work has to be done directly in Debian
(and upstream).

> Gerardo

cu
Adrian

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Gerardo Ballabio <gerardo.ballabio@gmail.com> - 2024-03-04 10:10 +0100
  Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 12:00 +0100

csiph-web