Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #82600

Bug#1072004: linux: regression in the 9p protocol in 6.8 breaks autopkgtest qemu jobs (affecting debci)

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Luca,

On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 09:49:47PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Mon, 27 May 2024 14:31:37 +0200 Thorsten Leemhuis
> <regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote:
> > On 27.05.24 14:22, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/+bug/2056461
> > > 
> > > This has been reported upstream 3 weeks ago, but so far it seems no
> > > action has been taken:
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zj0ErxVBE3DYT2Ea@gpd/
> > 
> > Hmmm, that thread is strange, why are David's replies not where they
> are
> > supposed to be? Whatever. The last thing from just a few days ago
> seems
> > to be a inquiry from David to Andrea that was not yet answered
> afaics:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/531994.1716450257@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
> > 
> > Would also help a lot to know if this is a 6.8.y only thing, or
> happens
> > with 6.9 and mainline as well, as 6.8.y will likely be EOLed soon.
> 
> That's not available anywhere (in a usable form) so it's a question for
> kernel maintainers.
> 
> Salvatore, what's the moreinfo for? Were you not able to reproduce it?
> Just try to run any isolation-machine autopkgtest (eg: src:dpdk) in a
> qem image (eg: built with autopkgtest-build-qemu) and compare unstable
> vs testing.

The aim for the moreinfo tag is to gather more information on which if
we know it's fixed with 6.9.y or mainline to have an idea why the
above thread might have stalled upstream.

I think I would ideally have first one 6.8.y version going to testing
and Diederik did work on rebasing already for 6.9.y, so we might move
then to that one with 6.8.y going EOL.

Regards,
Salvatore

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1072004: linux: regression in the 9p protocol in 6.8 breaks autopkgtest qemu jobs (affecting debci) Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2024-05-27 14:10 +0200
  Bug#1072004: linux: regression in the 9p protocol in 6.8 breaks autopkgtest qemu jobs (affecting debci) Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2024-05-27 23:00 +0200
    Bug#1072004: linux: regression in the 9p protocol in 6.8 breaks autopkgtest qemu jobs (affecting debci) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-05-28 06:00 +0200
      Bug#1072004: linux: regression in the 9p protocol in 6.8 breaks autopkgtest qemu jobs (affecting debci) Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2024-05-28 11:00 +0200
  Bug#1072004: linux: regression in the 9p protocol in 6.8 breaks autopkgtest qemu jobs (affecting debci) Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> - 2024-05-29 23:20 +0200
    Bug#1072004: linux: regression in the 9p protocol in 6.8 breaks autopkgtest qemu jobs (affecting debci) Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> - 2024-05-30 12:10 +0200
      Bug#1072004: linux: regression in the 9p protocol in 6.8 breaks autopkgtest qemu jobs (affecting debci) Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> - 2024-05-30 21:40 +0200
  Bug#1072004: Possible fix for 9p change breaking autopkgtest-build-qemu Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 18:20 +0200
  Bug#1072004: linux: regression in the 9p protocol in 6.8 breaks autopkgtest qemu jobs (affecting debci) Tj <tj.iam.tj@proton.me> - 2024-07-14 18:40 +0200
  Processed: Re: linux: regression in the 9p protocol in 6.8 breaks  autopkgtest qemu jobs (affecting debci) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-08-14 21:10 +0200
  Bug#1072004: linux: regression in the 9p protocol in 6.8 breaks autopkgtest qemu jobs (affecting debci) Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-08-14 21:10 +0200
  Bug#1072004: marked as done (linux: regression in the 9p protocol  in 6.8 breaks autopkgtest qemu jobs (affecting debci)) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-08-22 20:20 +0200

csiph-web