Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #81800
| From | Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.kernel, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#1063338: [regression 6.1.76] dlm: cannot start dlm midcomms -97 after backport of e9cdebbe23f1 ("dlm: use kernel_connect() and kernel_bind()") |
| Date | 2024-02-08 22:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <I5k82-8OQh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <I4UZX-8zzf-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <I5bHr-8JRe-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <I5gH7-8MIT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <I4sr0-8hwn-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <I5gH7-8MIT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi Valentin,
Would you be able to confirm that the attached patch fixes your issue as well?
-Jordan
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:42 AM Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 3:37 AM Valentin Kleibel <valentin@vrvis.at> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jordan, hi all
> >
> > > Just a quick look comparing dlm_tcp_listen_bind between the latest 6.1
> > > and 6.6 stable branches,
> > > it looks like there is a mismatch here with the dlm_local_addr[0] parameter.
> > >
> > > 6.1
> > > ----
> > >
> > > static int dlm_tcp_listen_bind(struct socket *sock)
> > > {
> > > int addr_len;
> > >
> > > /* Bind to our port */
> > > make_sockaddr(dlm_local_addr[0], dlm_config.ci_tcp_port, &addr_len);
> > > return kernel_bind(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&dlm_local_addr[0],
> > > addr_len);
> > > }
> > >
> > > 6.6
> > > ----
> > > static int dlm_tcp_listen_bind(struct socket *sock)
> > > {
> > > int addr_len;
> > >
> > > /* Bind to our port */
> > > make_sockaddr(&dlm_local_addr[0], dlm_config.ci_tcp_port, &addr_len);
> > > return kernel_bind(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&dlm_local_addr[0],
> > > addr_len);
> > > }
> > >
> > > 6.6 contains commit c51c9cd8 (fs: dlm: don't put dlm_local_addrs on heap) which
> > > changed
> > >
> > > static struct sockaddr_storage *dlm_local_addr[DLM_MAX_ADDR_COUNT];
> > >
> > > to
> > >
> > > static struct sockaddr_storage dlm_local_addr[DLM_MAX_ADDR_COUNT];
> > >
> > > It looks like kernel_bind() in 6.1 needs to be modified to match.
> >
> > We tried to apply commit c51c9cd8 (fs: dlm: don't put dlm_local_addrs on
> > heap) to the debian kernel 6.1.76 and came up with the attached patch.
> > Besides the different offsets there is a slight change dlm_tcp_bind()
> > where in 6.1.76 kernel_bind() is used instead of sock->ops->bind() in
> > the original commit.
> >
> > This patch solves the issue we experienced.
> >
> > Thanks for your help,
> > Valentin
>
> Good to hear that works for you! We should fix this in the 6.1 stable
> kernel as well.
>
> IMO it may be less risky and simpler to fix the backport of my patch
> e9cdebbe23f1 ("dlm: use kernel_connect() and
> kernel_bind()") and just switch (struct sockaddr *)&dlm_local_addr[0]
> to (struct sockaddr *)dlm_local_addr[0]
> in the call to kernel_bind() rather than backporting c51c9cd8 (fs:
> dlm: don't put dlm_local_addrs on
> heap) to 6.1.
>
> I will have some time soon to fix the 6.1 backport, but it may make
> sense just to revert in the meantime.
>
> -Jordan
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1063338: dlm: cannot start dlm midcomms -97 Valentin Kleibel <valentin@vrvis.at> - 2024-02-06 13:10 +0100
Bug#1063338: [regression 6.1.67] dlm: cannot start dlm midcomms -97 after backport of e9cdebbe23f1 ("dlm: use kernel_connect() and kernel_bind()") Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-02-07 11:50 +0100
Bug#1063338: [regression 6.1.67] dlm: cannot start dlm midcomms -97 after backport of e9cdebbe23f1 ("dlm: use kernel_connect() and kernel_bind()") Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> - 2024-02-07 19:40 +0100
Bug#1063338: [regression 6.1.67] dlm: cannot start dlm midcomms -97 after backport of e9cdebbe23f1 ("dlm: use kernel_connect() and kernel_bind()") Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> - 2024-02-07 22:40 +0100
Bug#1063338: [regression 6.1.76] dlm: cannot start dlm midcomms -97 after backport of e9cdebbe23f1 ("dlm: use kernel_connect() and kernel_bind()") Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> - 2024-02-08 18:50 +0100
Bug#1063338: [regression 6.1.76] dlm: cannot start dlm midcomms -97 after backport of e9cdebbe23f1 ("dlm: use kernel_connect() and kernel_bind()") Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> - 2024-02-08 22:30 +0100
Bug#1063338: [regression 6.1.76] dlm: cannot start dlm midcomms -97 after backport of e9cdebbe23f1 ("dlm: use kernel_connect() and kernel_bind()") Valentin Kleibel <valentin@vrvis.at> - 2024-02-09 12:10 +0100
Bug#1063338: [regression 6.1.76] dlm: cannot start dlm midcomms -97 after backport of e9cdebbe23f1 ("dlm: use kernel_connect() and kernel_bind()") Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> - 2024-02-09 17:40 +0100
Bug#1063338: dlm: cannot start dlm midcomms -97 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-02-19 21:10 +0100
Processed: Re: Bug#1063338: dlm: cannot start dlm midcomms -97 "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-02-19 21:10 +0100
csiph-web