Re: Uploading linux (6.6.15-1)

From	Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.maint.boot
Subject	Re: Uploading linux (6.6.15-1)
Date	2024-02-03 09:10 +0100
Message-ID	<I3jg5-7yvd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<I381j-7rfr-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <I3bix-7tc6-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Hi,

On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 12:32:08AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2024-02-02):
> > One thing is still unresolved, thus additonally to the explicit CC to
> > kibi, as well including debian-boot. We have the armel d-i situation
> > not yet resolved, debian-boot folks, do you have any imput on the
> > situation from the thread in 
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2024/01/msg00089.html ?
> > My gut feeling from what was discussed is that nobody will ever use
> > the d-i on armel.
> 
> I'm not sure how much time armel will stick around (for existing
> systems), but it looks to me that d-i/armel is no longer relevant.

Thanks for your reply on d-i side of this. So i suggest we move ahead
with transitioning 6.6.y to testing accordingly.

Thanks a lot!

Regards,
Salvatore

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Uploading linux (6.6.15-1) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-02-02 21:10 +0100
  Re: Uploading linux (6.6.15-1) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-02-03 00:40 +0100
    Re: Uploading linux (6.6.15-1) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-02-03 09:10 +0100

csiph-web