Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #80846

Bug#1040416: linux-image-6.1.0-9-amd64: Under heavy load Debian V12 and V11 causes data corruption on XFS filesystems.

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi

On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 08:33:58PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Control: found -1 6.1~rc3-1~exp1
> Control: found -1 6.1.55-1
> 
> On Saturday, 4 November 2023 20:35:43 CET Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> > > Ok. Please test (when you have time) 6.1.55-1.
> > 
> > Fail : Linux afs31 6.1.0-0-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian
> > 6.1~rc3-1~exp1 (2022-11-02) x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > 
> > Fail : Linux afs31 6.1.0-13-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.55-1
> > (2023-09-29) x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > 
> > Done.  I tested even the first 6.1 on Debian.  Both of them failed.
> 
> Thanks, updated metadata accordingly.
> So now we know it's indeed present in the whole 6.1 series.
> 
> > > Unfortunately there isn't a 6.2 kernel uploaded to the Debian archive and
> > > thus not available on snapshot.d.o, but testing 6.3.1-1~exp1 should be
> > > useful.
> 
> Please test with with 6.3.1-1~exp1 to make sure it was fixed then (too).
> 
> Unfortunately, the commit list between 6.1 and 6.3.1 is quite large:
> me@pc:~/dev/kernel.org/linux$ git log --oneline v6.1..v6.3.1 -- fs/xfs | wc -l
> 159
> 
> If that list was small, I could've suggested to try 'backporting' a couple of 
> patches, but that avenue seems rather pointless in this case.
> 
> It's probably also useful to verify whether it's also present in the whole 
> 5.10 series, which should give (even) more data points.
> 
> I think the next step should be to 'forward' this bug report to the upstream 
> mailing list at linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org

I do not follow closely linux-xfs mailing list, but I think other
people already reported problems with 6.1 and are trying to do the
effort of delimiting the patch and test a backport to 6.1.

Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz

-- 
--
	Egoista, s. m. Um sujeito mais interessado em si próprio que
	em mim.
		-- Ambrose Bierce

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1040416: linux-image-6.1.0-9-amd64: Under heavy load Debian V12 and V11 causes data corruption on XFS filesystems. Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2023-11-02 15:50 +0100
  Bug#1040416: linux-image-6.1.0-9-amd64: Under heavy load Debian V12 and V11 causes data corruption on XFS filesystems. Jose M Calhariz <jose.calhariz@tecnico.ulisboa.pt> - 2023-11-02 18:20 +0100
    Bug#1040416: linux-image-6.1.0-9-amd64: Under heavy load Debian V12 and V11 causes data corruption on XFS filesystems. Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2023-11-02 20:00 +0100
      Processed: Re: Bug#1040416: linux-image-6.1.0-9-amd64: Under  heavy load Debian V12 and V11 causes data corruption on XFS filesystems. "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2023-11-02 20:00 +0100
      Bug#1040416: linux-image-6.1.0-9-amd64: Under heavy load Debian V12 and V11 causes data corruption on XFS filesystems. Jose M Calhariz <jose.calhariz@tecnico.ulisboa.pt> - 2023-11-04 20:40 +0100
        Bug#1040416: linux-image-6.1.0-9-amd64: Under heavy load Debian V12 and V11 causes data corruption on XFS filesystems. Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2023-11-07 20:40 +0100
          Bug#1040416: linux-image-6.1.0-9-amd64: Under heavy load Debian V12 and V11 causes data corruption on XFS filesystems. Jose M Calhariz <jose.calhariz@tecnico.ulisboa.pt> - 2023-11-08 17:10 +0100

csiph-web