Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #80636
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y? |
| Date | Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:40:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <HnijD-eQDD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <HmEPf-eqdx-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <HmFLj-eqM9-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <HnhQB-eQol-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <Hni0h-eQuf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org Tue Oct 10 10:30:01 2023 |
| Old-Return-Path | <emarocca@gmail.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -5.5 |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AOJu0YxoI7N+6c7+10hj817WqlMRb8XSFLLU4I6DERVUDnALLS0EqXKG LwtDcvXS2KZnV2lbgbOTWQY= |
| X-Google-SMTP-Source | AGHT+IEYZLV6FPbY9jfy4f2KG0j6C7tVFlaftAk+mrN5ikDM1LjNIXN2vJwh4r5eJXOGzG+A9d60ZQ== |
| X-Received | by 2002:a17:906:7496:b0:9a5:ce62:6e1a with SMTP id e22-20020a170906749600b009a5ce626e1amr15311054ejl.1.1696933778872; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 03:29:38 -0700 (PDT) |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/140325 |
| List-ID | <debian-kernel.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ZSUoNpKCY5wn9tXq@ariel |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 15 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | debian-kernel@lists.debian.org |
| X-Original-Date | Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:32:22 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <ZSUoNpKCY5wn9tXq@ariel> |
| X-Original-References | <169678202078.3029203.13684704010302829243@localhost> <3679117.hVnToU1rA3@bagend> <ZSUi_6M1vmdRFTAm@ariel> <169693286797.3453145.7694745520755158332@localhost> |
| X-Original-Sender | Emanuele Rocca <emarocca@gmail.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.kernel:80636 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hello Johannes, On 2023-10-10 12:14, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Quoting Emanuele Rocca (2023-10-10 12:10:07) > > Setting CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y on arm64 is likely safe for us too, but > > we may want to run some benchmark first to see if there are any noticeable > > slowdowns. > > I have a couple of arm64 boards here that I can run benchmarks on. What would > you recommend to run to test the effect of CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y? I'm not sure what the best benchmark would be, but maybe you could start with something generic like timing a kernel build with and without PREEMPT_DYNAMIC and throwing 'hey' at your favorite web server? https://github.com/rakyll/hey
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y? Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org> - 2023-10-08 18:30 +0200
Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2023-10-08 19:30 +0200
Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y? Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> - 2023-10-10 12:10 +0200
Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y? Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org> - 2023-10-10 12:20 +0200
Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y? Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> - 2023-10-10 12:40 +0200
Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y? Marc Haber <mh+debian-kernel@zugschlus.de> - 2023-10-10 15:50 +0200
Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2023-10-10 14:00 +0200
Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y? Vincent Blut <vincent.debian@free.fr> - 2023-10-10 14:20 +0200
Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2023-10-10 15:20 +0200
Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y? Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> - 2023-10-10 15:00 +0200
Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2023-10-10 23:30 +0200
Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y? Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2023-10-17 20:00 +0200
Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y? Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> - 2023-10-20 20:40 +0200
csiph-web