Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.ports.arm
Subject	Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
Date	Sat, 13 Jan 2024 18:00:01 +0100
Message-ID	<HVPwt-2QmS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<HUZRg-2kyJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <HUZRg-2kyJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <HVylX-2FB2-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <HVPd7-2Qgg-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org Sat Jan 13 16:58:15 2024
Old-Return-Path	<waldi@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-112.278 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-2.758, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Mail-Followup-To	debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition	inline
X-Mailing-List	<debian-kernel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/141465
List-ID	<debian-kernel.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20240113164115.pcaa5kkxxornmb6w@shell.thinkmo.de
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	19
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:41:15 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<20240113164115.pcaa5kkxxornmb6w@shell.thinkmo.de>
X-Original-References	<20240111092539.bxfkazh7wvypw4gv@shell.thinkmo.de> <CADWks+YozTqkg-q_vt22d703YvxiaxKSa4M3=_3t8DWqqej4Bg@mail.gmail.com> <20240112221950.mtspkztyyy6eblv6@shell.thinkmo.de> <CADWks+aT2Hwe2nMVMErQOFOwbJ09=GKcKjUHV7VbHrKFzdu1Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.kernel:81560 linux.debian.ports.arm:13868

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 04:31:35PM +0000, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2024, 22:36 Bastian Blank, <waldi@debian.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:48:34AM +0000, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > > Disabling debug symbols, enabling debug symbol zstd compression, using
> > > split debug symbols (disabled BTF usage) should help here.
> > Disabling debug symbols does not help.
> This now smells a lot more like an actual bug in either kernel source code,
> or compiler, or both. Rather than natural growth and actually needing that
> much memory. Probably worth escalating.

What actually helps is -ftrack-macro-expansion=1.

https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/998

Bastian

-- 
The joys of love made her human and the agonies of love destroyed her.
		-- Spock, "Requiem for Methuselah", stardate 5842.8

Thread

Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 10:50 +0100
  Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com> - 2024-01-11 10:50 +0100
    Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 11:50 +0100
      Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 12:50 +0100
        Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 18:40 +0100
          Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2024-01-13 19:50 +0100
      Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-01-11 17:10 +0100
        Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com> - 2024-01-12 17:20 +0100
          Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Alan Corey <alan01346@gmail.com> - 2024-01-12 19:30 +0100
            Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> - 2024-01-13 04:50 +0100
              Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com> - 2024-01-13 04:50 +0100
                Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> - 2024-01-13 14:20 +0100
                Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> - 2024-01-13 17:00 +0100
                Re: Offer to make a native 32-bit system avaiable rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> - 2024-01-13 20:20 +0100
                Re: Offer to make a native 32-bit system avaiable Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com> - 2024-01-13 21:10 +0100
              Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> - 2024-01-13 14:30 +0100
    Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-12 23:40 +0100
      Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com> - 2024-01-13 17:40 +0100
        Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-13 18:00 +0100
  Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 11:50 +0100
  gcc displaying bullshit allocation numbers? (was: Re: Ability to  further support 32bit architectures) Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-13 18:00 +0100

csiph-web